Continental SportContact 7 vs Vredestein Ultrac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 22 + 14 road tests and 1,629 + 419 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)
“Are budget tyres closing the gap to premium? I changed a set of tyres on my daily pd130 winter bash about and managed to get a set of vredestein ultrac for £80 a tyre fitted which I thought was a pretty good price. The tyre fitting service was saying to me that the gap between budgets and premium is much smaller in the last 10 years and that taxis tend to opt for budget tyres all the time and have no issues. Any thoughts on this? I’ve always gone for medium to higher end tyres. Leer más”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
97
Dry
SportContact 7 +22
75
Why this score
Source
SportContact 7
Ultrac
Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 13 tests
100
84
Reviews found online
92
60
SportContact 7:60% × 99.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 97
Ultrac:60% × 84.3 + 40% × 60.3 = 75
95
Wet
SportContact 7 +13
82
Why this score
Source
SportContact 7
Ultrac
Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 13 tests
96
92
Reviews found online
93
66
SportContact 7:60% × 95.5 + 40% × 93.3 = 95
Ultrac:60% × 92 + 40% × 66.4 = 82
70
Comfort
SportContact 7 +7
63
Why this score
Source
SportContact 7
Ultrac
Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests
56
≈ 67 (est.)
Reviews found online
79
60
SportContact 7:40% × 55.8 + 60% × 78.8 = 70
Ultrac:40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.3 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Ultrac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7 or Ultrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
69
Treadwear
SportContact 7 +44
25
Why this score
Source
SportContact 7
Ultrac
Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests
72
10
Reviews found online
64
48
SportContact 7:60% × 72 + 40% × 63.9 = 69
Ultrac:60% × 10 + 40% × 48.3 = 25
91
Handling (owners)
SportContact 7 +31
60
Why this score
Source
SportContact 7
Ultrac
Reviews found online
91
60
72
Efficiency
Level
72
Why this score
Source
SportContact 7
Ultrac
Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 11 tests
72
72
Scores at a glance
Continental SportContact 7 vs Vredestein Ultrac: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Continental SportContact 7
Vredestein Ultrac
Relative Score
84
61
Dry
97
75
Wet
95
82
Comfort
70
63
Noise
62
67
Treadwear
69
25
Handling (owners)
91
60
Efficiency
72
72
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
± 5
SportContact 7
61
/ 100
± 6
Ultrac
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental SportContact 7
Positive
The community generally regards the SportContact 7 as an excellent ultra-high-performance tire, praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, direct steering, quick warm-up, and good rim protection. Many rank it at or above the Michelin PS4S and ahead of the PS5 and Goodyear Asymmetric 6 for outright performance. The main criticisms are fast tread wear (often about 10–15k miles), low starting tread depth, softer sidewalls, some tramlining and noise, and poor durability on track.
#Exceptional grip#Fast tread wear#Comparison with PS4S#Wet performance#Track durability#Comfort and noise#Rim protection#PremiumContact 7 alternative
Based on 115 community posts
Tire B
Vredestein Ultrac
Positive
Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac favorably, recommending it as offering the best of both worlds at a good price point. While drivers appreciate its appearance and value on daily vehicles, prospective buyers express inquiries regarding noise levels and potential fast tread wear.
Top themes
#good price point#best of both worlds#tread wear concerns#tire recommendation#wide tire appearance#budget versus premium
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Continental SportContact 7
B · Vredestein Ultrac
Category
Summer
Summer
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
123
65
Rim diameters
18″ – 24″
15″ – 21″
Tread depth
8 - 9/32″
—
UTQG
240 AA A
280 AA A
Sidewall
Black Side Wall
—
Max pressure
50 - 51 psi
—
Sizes in common
4
4
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Continental SportContact 7
61
/ 100
Vredestein Ultrac
Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire AYou want the longest tread life
Continental SportContact 7 scores 69 vs 25 on treadwear.
Pick tire AYou enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental SportContact 7 scores 91 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire AYou want the most grip on dry roads
Continental SportContact 7 scores 97 vs 75 on dry.
Pick tire AYour priority is wet-weather safety
Continental SportContact 7 scores 95 vs 82 on wet.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology