Head-to-head Updated

Continental SportContact 7 vs Vredestein Ultrac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 22 + 14 road tests and 1,629 + 419 owner reviews. How we score

SportContact 7 is ahead, 84–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental SportContact 7
± 5

Tests 84 · 22 tests Owners 83 · 1,629 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”

Vredestein Ultrac

Ultrac

Summer

± 6

Tests 63 · 14 tests Owners 59 · 419 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

“Are budget tyres closing the gap to premium? I changed a set of tyres on my daily pd130 winter bash about and managed to get a set of vredestein ultrac for £80 a tyre fitted which I thought was a pretty good price. The tyre fitting service was saying to me that the gap between budgets and premium is much smaller in the last 10 years and that taxis tend to opt for budget tyres all the time and have no issues. Any thoughts on this? I’ve always gone for medium to higher end tyres. Leer más”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 97

    Dry

    SportContact 7 +22
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 13 tests10084
    Reviews found online9260

    SportContact 7: 60% × 99.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 97

    Ultrac: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 60.3 = 75

  2. 95

    Wet

    SportContact 7 +13
    82
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 13 tests9692
    Reviews found online9366

    SportContact 7: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 93.3 = 95

    Ultrac: 60% × 92 + 40% × 66.4 = 82

  3. 70

    Comfort

    SportContact 7 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests56≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7960

    SportContact 7: 40% × 55.8 + 60% × 78.8 = 70

    Ultrac: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.3 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Ultrac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 62

    Noise

    Ultrac +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 11 tests5967
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    SportContact 7: 60% × 59.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 62

    Ultrac: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7 or Ultrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 69

    Treadwear

    SportContact 7 +44
    25
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7210
    Reviews found online6448

    SportContact 7: 60% × 72 + 40% × 63.9 = 69

    Ultrac: 60% × 10 + 40% × 48.3 = 25

  6. 91

    Handling (owners)

    SportContact 7 +31
    60
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ultrac
    Reviews found online9160
  7. 72

    Efficiency

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSportContact 7Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 11 tests7272
Scores at a glance
Continental SportContact 7 vs Vredestein Ultrac: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental SportContact 7Vredestein Ultrac
Relative Score 84 61
Dry 97 75
Wet 95 82
Comfort 70 63
Noise 62 67
Treadwear 69 25
Handling (owners) 91 60
Efficiency 72 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

SportContact 7

± 6

Ultrac

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategorySportContact 7UltracΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 90% #6/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 98% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 80% #9/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 87% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 99% #2/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 100% #1/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 100% #1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 88% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 98% #3/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 98% #9/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 80% #7/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Exterior Noise Noise 98% #4/7 · 2025 Autobild Sportcars Summer Tire Test R20 100% #1/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Interior Noise Noise 90% #2/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 80% #8/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 99% #3/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 87% #7/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test 80% #8/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test – Different tests
Abrasion Treadwear 69% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 47% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 58% #9/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 39% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% #6/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 97% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 99% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test 98% #11/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 62% #11/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test 68% #10/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 33% #15/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 35% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #2/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test #9/12 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SportContact 7

Pros

  • Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Strong braking performance and high stability at speed

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
  • Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
  • Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the SportContact 7 review

Tire B Ultrac

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet weather conditions
  • High level of ride comfort and ability to absorb road bumps
  • Low road noise and quiet operation

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by several drivers
  • Softer sidewalls leading to less initial steering feedback or stability
  • Occasional complaints of tramlining or tracking narrow road repairs
All owner themes in the Ultrac review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental SportContact 7

Positive

The community generally regards the SportContact 7 as an excellent ultra-high-performance tire, praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, direct steering, quick warm-up, and good rim protection. Many rank it at or above the Michelin PS4S and ahead of the PS5 and Goodyear Asymmetric 6 for outright performance. The main criticisms are fast tread wear (often about 10–15k miles), low starting tread depth, softer sidewalls, some tramlining and noise, and poor durability on track.

Top themes
#Exceptional grip#Fast tread wear#Comparison with PS4S#Wet performance#Track durability#Comfort and noise#Rim protection#PremiumContact 7 alternative

Based on 115 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac

Positive

Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac favorably, recommending it as offering the best of both worlds at a good price point. While drivers appreciate its appearance and value on daily vehicles, prospective buyers express inquiries regarding noise levels and potential fast tread wear.

Top themes
#good price point#best of both worlds#tread wear concerns#tire recommendation#wide tire appearance#budget versus premium

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental SportContact 7 B · Vredestein Ultrac
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available12365
Rim diameters18″ – 24″15″ – 21″
Tread depth8 - 9/32″—
UTQG240 AA A280 AA A
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental SportContact 7

Vredestein Ultrac

Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental SportContact 7 scores 69 vs 25 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental SportContact 7 scores 91 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental SportContact 7 scores 97 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental SportContact 7 scores 95 vs 82 on wet.

Tire A · Continental SportContact 7
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SportContact 7 or Ultrac?

Which is better in the wet, SportContact 7 or Ultrac?

Continental SportContact 7, 95 vs 82 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SportContact 7 or Ultrac?

Continental SportContact 7, 97 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, SportContact 7 or Ultrac?

Vredestein Ultrac, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, SportContact 7 or Ultrac?

Continental SportContact 7, 70 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SportContact 7 or Ultrac?

Continental SportContact 7, 69 vs 25 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, SportContact 7 or Ultrac?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology