Head-to-head Updated

Continental VikingContact 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 800 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

WinterContact TS 800 is ahead, 78–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    WinterContact TS 800 +19
    77
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6WinterContact TS 800
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online5382

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    WinterContact TS 800: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.1 = 77

    No road tests of dry for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    WinterContact TS 800 +19
    84
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6WinterContact TS 800
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 80 (est.)
    Reviews found online6389

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    WinterContact TS 800: 60% × 80.5 (est.) + 40% × 88.6 = 84

    No road tests of wet for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    WinterContact TS 800 +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6WinterContact TS 800
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5779

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 63

    WinterContact TS 800: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of snow for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    WinterContact TS 800 +17
    77
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6WinterContact TS 800
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5681

    VikingContact 6: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 55.5 = 60

    WinterContact TS 800: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 81.3 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for VikingContact 6 or WinterContact TS 800. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    WinterContact TS 800 +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6WinterContact TS 800
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6481

    VikingContact 6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65

    WinterContact TS 800: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 56

    Handling (owners)

    WinterContact TS 800 +29
    85
    Why this score
    SourceVikingContact 6WinterContact TS 800
    Reviews found online5685
Scores at a glance
Continental VikingContact 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 800: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental VikingContact 6Continental WinterContact TS 800
Relative Score 62 78
Dry 58 77
Wet 65 84
Snow 63 75
Comfort 60 77
Treadwear 65 75
Handling (owners) 56 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

VikingContact 6

± 8

WinterContact TS 800

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A VikingContact 6

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and mountain conditions
  • Impressive durability and tread longevity, even when used out of season
  • Acceptable road noise levels

Cons

  • Significant loss of winter grip on snow and ice as the tread wears down
  • Squeaks on dry, warm tarmac when driven in warmer conditions
  • Lacks road feeling and sharp handling responsiveness
All owner themes in the VikingContact 6 review

Tire B WinterContact TS 800

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, and compressed snow
  • Reliable braking and handling performance on wet and icy surfaces
  • Impressive tread longevity even under varied driving conditions

Cons

  • Increased road noise compared to some summer tire models
  • Reduced handling precision and performance when temperatures exceed 10°C
  • Soft compound can feel less stable during aggressive dry-weather driving
All owner themes in the WinterContact TS 800 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental VikingContact 6 B · Continental WinterContact TS 800
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available106
Rim diameters14″ – 21″13″ – 15″
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental VikingContact 6

Continental WinterContact TS 800

Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 800 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental VikingContact 6 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental WinterContact TS 800 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 85 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 77 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 84 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 77 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental VikingContact 6
Tire B · Continental WinterContact TS 800

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

VikingContact 6 or WinterContact TS 800?

Which is better in the wet, VikingContact 6 or WinterContact TS 800?

Continental WinterContact TS 800, 84 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, VikingContact 6 or WinterContact TS 800?

Continental WinterContact TS 800, 77 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, VikingContact 6 or WinterContact TS 800?

Continental WinterContact TS 800, 75 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, VikingContact 6 or WinterContact TS 800?

Continental WinterContact TS 800, 77 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, VikingContact 6 or WinterContact TS 800?

Continental WinterContact TS 800, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology