tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Discoverer A/TT SUV and DynaPro A/TM RF10 are level at 72.

Check price on Amazon · Discoverer A/TT SUV Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TT SUVDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7577

    Discoverer A/TT SUV: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Discoverer A/TT SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TT SUVDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    Discoverer A/TT SUV: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 71

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Discoverer A/TT SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    Discoverer A/TT SUV +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TT SUVDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6659

    Discoverer A/TT SUV: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 68

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 64

    No road tests of snow for Discoverer A/TT SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TT SUVDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6974

    Discoverer A/TT SUV: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.3 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Discoverer A/TT SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TT SUVDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    Discoverer A/TT SUV +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TT SUVDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7878

    Discoverer A/TT SUV: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 74

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer A/TT SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Discoverer A/TT SUV +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer A/TT SUVDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online7470
Scores at a glance
CategoryCooper Discoverer A/TT SUVHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 72 72
Dry 73 74
Wet 71 74
Snow 68 64
Comfort 69 73
Noise – 69
Treadwear 74 73
Handling (owners) 74 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Discoverer A/TT SUV

± 7

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Discoverer A/TT SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional durability and long tread life, with minimal wear reported even after tens of thousands of miles
  • Strong off-road performance aided by rugged, reinforced sidewalls
  • Great handling, stability, and grip on dry asphalt

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip and a tendency to slide in rainy conditions
  • Mediocre braking performance and traction in snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
  • Noticeable road noise at certain speeds
All owner themes in the Discoverer A/TT SUV review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—29
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Too close to call: Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 are within 2 points overall. Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV is stronger on snow. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on comfort and wet. Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV scores 68 vs 64 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 71 on wet.

Tire A · Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Discoverer A/TT SUV or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Discoverer A/TT SUV or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Discoverer A/TT SUV or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Discoverer A/TT SUV or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Cooper Discoverer A/TT SUV, 68 vs 64 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Discoverer A/TT SUV or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Discoverer A/TT SUV or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology