Cooper Discoverer MS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Cooper Discoverer MS vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 27 road tests and 9 + 3,659 owner reviews. How we score

Discoverer MS leads, 75–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Discoverer MS
Tire ACooper

Discoverer MS

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 9 reviews

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Tire BHankook

Kinergy 4S2

All Season

± 4

Tests 78 · 27 tests Owners 60 · 3,659 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)

“Zimske gume - premium ili neka srednja klasa? Nakon 2 proklizavanja u skretanju ovaj vikend (po kiši) zaključila sam da je vrijeme da kupim nove gume. Otkako sam uzela auto (prosinac 2022.) imam jedne te iste cjelogodišnje gume, Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 225/45/R17. Prošlu zimu kad je bilo snijega jedva sam kući s posla išla koliko sam se klizala po ulici, kiša još nekako ali snijeg i led katastrofa. Ove godine je i na kiši počeo proklizavati. Auto je zadnji pogon, 115ks ništa specijalno. Ono što me zanima je koliko ima smisla uzeti neke premium gume obzirom da godišnje radim oko 15k kilometara, većinski po gradu (Slavonija), tu i tamo autoput do Zg, možda 2 puta godišnje Mađarska/Austrija/Slovenija. Vidim da svi hvale Continental Wintercontact TS870 ali poprilično su skupe pa imate li možda preporuku za nešto jeftinije, a kvalitetno? Više me zanima da su dobre za kišu jer snijega nema nešto specijalno i sve će biti bolje nego ove koje sad imam. Što se dimenzije tiče imam jedne alu felge pa bih onda uzela istu dimenziju čisto da se ne moram izut iz cipela zbog troškova s kupovanjem još i felgi. TLDR: Zimska guma, 225/45/R17, zadnji pogon, što kupiti? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Discoverer MS +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer MSKinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests≈ 72 (est.)83
    Reviews found online7856

    Discoverer MS: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 75

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 56 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Level
    78
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer MSKinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests≈ 76 (est.)87
    Reviews found online8165

    Discoverer MS: 60% × 76.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 78

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 64.9 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 77

    Snow

    Discoverer MS +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer MSKinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests≈ 74 (est.)79
    Reviews found online8161

    Discoverer MS: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.2 = 77

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 60.9 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Discoverer MS +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer MSKinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 68 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6854

    Discoverer MS: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.9 = 68

    Kinergy 4S2: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 54.4 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer MSKinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests–62
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 61.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Discoverer MS +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer MSKinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 68 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7260

    Discoverer MS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 59.7 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Discoverer MS +19
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer MSKinergy 4S2
    Reviews found online7556
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    51
    Why this score
    SourceDiscoverer MSKinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests–51
Scores at a glance
Cooper Discoverer MS vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper Discoverer MSHankook Kinergy 4S2
Relative Score 75 71
Dry 75 72
Wet 78 78
Snow 77 72
Comfort 68 61
Noise – 64
Treadwear 70 67
Handling (owners) 75 56
Efficiency – 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Discoverer MS

± 4

Kinergy 4S2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Discoverer MS

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in severe winter conditions including deep snow, ice, and slush
  • Strong off-road capabilities and mud performance unusual for a dedicated winter tire
  • Impressive tread life and overall longevity compared to competitors

Cons

  • Can develop significant road noise as the tires age
  • Potential for rough ride quality and vibrations if alignment or wear issues occur
  • Not quite equal to dedicated studded tires in extreme hardcore ice conditions without studs
All owner themes in the Discoverer MS review

Tire B Kinergy 4S2

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip, braking, and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong performance and confidence in cold temperatures, light snow, and slush
  • High overall value for money compared to premium tier alternatives

Cons

  • Increased road noise and occasional highway 'whining' or howling between 120-140 km/h
  • Some reports of faster-than-expected tread wear or uneven inner tread deformation
  • Softer sidewalls can induce initial steering delay or a slight floating feel during aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Cooper Discoverer MS

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Mixed

The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is widely regarded as a good-value 3PMSF all-weather tire, often recommended as a cheaper alternative to the Michelin CrossClimate 2 thanks to strong wet performance and good independent test results. Complaints include a stiff ride, highway road noise, fast or uneven tread wear, and weaker snow and ice grip for some owners. Several users noted that ice performance wasn't tested and that it suits milder, wet climates best.

Top themes
#Value vs CrossClimate 2#Wet traction#Snow and ice grip#Tread wear concerns#Ride comfort stiffness#Road noise#Tyre Reviews test results#EV and range use

Based on 34 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Discoverer MS B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—95
Rim diameters—14″ – 20″
UTQG—500 A A

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper Discoverer MS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Narrow edge: Cooper Discoverer MS — better handling, comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Cooper Discoverer MS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper Discoverer MS scores 75 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Cooper Discoverer MS scores 68 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Cooper Discoverer MS scores 77 vs 72 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper Discoverer MS scores 75 vs 72 on dry.

Tire A · Cooper Discoverer MS
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Discoverer MS or Kinergy 4S2?

Which is better in the wet, Discoverer MS or Kinergy 4S2?

Neither, by our numbers: 78 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Discoverer MS or Kinergy 4S2?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Discoverer MS or Kinergy 4S2?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 77 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Discoverer MS or Kinergy 4S2?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 68 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Discoverer MS or Kinergy 4S2?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology