tirewheelguide

Cooper Discoverer MS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Cooper Discoverer MS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Discoverer MS is ahead, 75–67

Check price on Amazon · Discoverer MS or Destination M/T2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Discoverer MS
Tire BCooper

Discoverer MS

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 9 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Discoverer MS +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Discoverer MS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6778

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    Discoverer MS: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Discoverer MS +7
    78
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Discoverer MS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online7181

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    Discoverer MS: 60% × 76.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Snow

    Discoverer MS +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Discoverer MS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7181

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71

    Discoverer MS: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.2 = 77

    No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Discoverer MS +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Discoverer MS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5968

    Destination M/T2: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62

    Discoverer MS: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 59

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Discoverer MS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online47–

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59

    No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Discoverer MS +14
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Discoverer MS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5072

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56

    Discoverer MS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Discoverer MS
    Reviews found online–75
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination M/T2Cooper Discoverer MS
Relative Score 67 75
Dry 67 75
Wet 71 78
Snow 71 77
Comfort 62 68
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 56 70
Handling (owners) – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Destination M/T2

± 8

Discoverer MS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

Tire B Discoverer MS

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in severe winter conditions including deep snow, ice, and slush
  • Strong off-road capabilities and mud performance unusual for a dedicated winter tire
  • Impressive tread life and overall longevity compared to competitors

Cons

  • Can develop significant road noise as the tires age
  • Potential for rough ride quality and vibrations if alignment or wear issues occur
  • Not quite equal to dedicated studded tires in extreme hardcore ice conditions without studs
All owner themes in the Discoverer MS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination M/T2 B · Cooper Discoverer MS
CategoryMud-Terrain tireWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available18—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth19/32″—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination M/T2

Cooper Discoverer MS

Winner: Cooper Discoverer MS — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Cooper Discoverer MS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Cooper Discoverer MS scores 70 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper Discoverer MS scores 75 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Cooper Discoverer MS scores 78 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Cooper Discoverer MS scores 77 vs 71 on snow.

Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Cooper Discoverer MS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination M/T2 or Discoverer MS?

Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer MS?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 78 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer MS?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 75 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer MS?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 77 vs 71 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer MS?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 68 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer MS?

Cooper Discoverer MS, 70 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology