Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 102 reviews
Cooper Discoverer MS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Cooper Discoverer MS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 102 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Discoverer MS is ahead, 75–69
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Discoverer MS +475Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Discoverer MS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 73 78 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
Discoverer MS: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 75
No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
Discoverer MS +1378Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Discoverer MS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 63 81 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
Discoverer MS: 60% × 76.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 78
No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Snow
Level77Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Discoverer MS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 82 81 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
Discoverer MS: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.2 = 77
No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
Discoverer MS +368Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Discoverer MS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 64 68 Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65
Discoverer MS: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.9 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Discoverer MS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 69 – Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 67
No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Trail-Terrain T/A +270Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Discoverer MS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 72 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
Discoverer MS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer MS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Discoverer MS +1175Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Discoverer MS Reviews found online 64 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | Cooper Discoverer MS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 75 |
| Dry | 71 | 75 |
| Wet | 65 | 78 |
| Snow | 77 | 77 |
| Comfort | 65 | 68 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Trail-Terrain T/A
Discoverer MS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A
Pros
- Low road noise for an all-terrain tire, with several reviewers calling it quieter than previous tires such as the AT3 and other all-terrains
- Strong snow and ice performance, including a Colorado snowstorm and multiple Alps trips with up to a foot of snow
- Comfortable, smooth ride and good handling and braking on the road
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction reported by several reviewers, including wheelspin, lack of confidence on wet roads and ABS activation issues
- Some reviewers found road noise high on paved surfaces, and one called it outrageously noisy, though others found it quiet
- Wear is faster for some owners, with one set nearing replacement after about 20,000 miles and two years
Tire B Discoverer MS
Pros
- Exceptional traction in severe winter conditions including deep snow, ice, and slush
- Strong off-road capabilities and mud performance unusual for a dedicated winter tire
- Impressive tread life and overall longevity compared to competitors
Cons
- Can develop significant road noise as the tires age
- Potential for rough ride quality and vibrations if alignment or wear issues occur
- Not quite equal to dedicated studded tires in extreme hardcore ice conditions without studs
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | B · Cooper Discoverer MS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | 50 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11 - 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 660 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Cooper Discoverer MS
Winner: Cooper Discoverer MS — better wet, handling and dry. Where the BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Cooper Discoverer MS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Cooper Discoverer MS scores 78 vs 65 on wet.
Cooper Discoverer MS scores 75 vs 64 on handling.
Cooper Discoverer MS scores 75 vs 71 on dry.
Cooper Discoverer MS scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Trail-Terrain T/A or Discoverer MS?
Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or Discoverer MS?
Cooper Discoverer MS, 78 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or Discoverer MS?
Cooper Discoverer MS, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Trail-Terrain T/A or Discoverer MS?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 77 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or Discoverer MS?
Cooper Discoverer MS, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or Discoverer MS?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology