Tests – · none yet Owners 83 · 5 reviews
Dunlop SP Sport 560 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
SP Sport 560 is ahead, 79–72
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
SP Sport 560 +771Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 84 73 SP Sport 560: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.8 = 78
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
80
Wet
SP Sport 560 +575Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 83 76 SP Sport 560: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 80
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
SP Sport 560 +474Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 82 76 SP Sport 560: 40% × 71.4 (est.) + 60% × 82.3 = 78
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
77
Treadwear
SP Sport 560 +1067Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 83 67 SP Sport 560: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 77
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
83
Handling (owners)
SP Sport 560 +677Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 83 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport 560 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 72 |
| Dry | 78 | 71 |
| Wet | 80 | 75 |
| Comfort | 78 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Sport 560
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport 560
Pros
- Exceptional value and competitive pricing compared to other premium tires
- Strong performance and grip on dry city roads
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Handling on wet roads can be challenging, though potentially influenced by narrower tire widths
- Limited size and vehicle context availability in early feedback
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport 560 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Sport 560
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Dunlop SP Sport 560 — better treadwear, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 560 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 77 vs 67 on treadwear.
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 78 vs 71 on dry.
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 83 vs 77 on handling.
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 80 vs 75 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport 560 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 560 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 80 vs 75 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 560 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 78 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 560 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 78 vs 74 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport 560 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 77 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology