tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 63 + 2,712 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport FM800 is ahead, 76–64

Check price on Amazon · SP Sport FM800 or Ecowing ES01 KH27 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    SP Sport FM800 +12
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7861

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 75

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 63

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 79

    Wet

    SP Sport FM800 +15
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 77 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8261

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 79

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Comfort

    SP Sport FM800 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7666

    SP Sport FM800: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.5 = 73

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 72

    Treadwear

    SP Sport FM800 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7664

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 72

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 79

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport FM800 +21
    58
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Reviews found online7958
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport FM800Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Relative Score 76 64
Dry 75 63
Wet 79 64
Comfort 73 67
Treadwear 72 65
Handling (owners) 79 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport FM800

± 8

Ecowing ES01 KH27

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport FM800

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong anti-aquaplaning capabilities
  • High value for money compared to premium brands like Michelin and Bridgestone
  • Low road noise and very quiet, smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Faster than average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Rubber compound can harden over time, leading to reduced performance as the tire ages
  • Softer sidewalls can occasionally result in slightly less precise steering feel
All owner themes in the SP Sport FM800 review

Tire B Ecowing ES01 KH27

Pros

  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
  • Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
  • Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES01 KH27 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
UTQG320 B A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Winner: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 79 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 79 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 75 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 72 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport FM800 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FM800 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 79 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FM800 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 75 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FM800 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 73 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport FM800 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 72 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology