Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 18 road tests and 62 + 1,263 owner reviews. How we score

EUROALL SEASON AS210 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS200

All Season

± 8

Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 68 · 62 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (noise)

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire BFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 70 · 18 tests Owners 68 · 1,263 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests6867
    Reviews found online6264

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 64.3 = 66

  2. 73

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests7282
    Reviews found online7571

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 74.5 = 73

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 71.1 = 77

  3. 64

    Snow

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 14 tests6264
    Reviews found online6767

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 60% × 62.1 + 40% × 66.5 = 64

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64 + 40% × 66.8 = 65

  4. 68

    Comfort

    EUROALL SEASON AS200 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6862

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.8 = 68

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 72.9 + 60% × 62.4 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for EUROALL SEASON AS200. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    45
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–31
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 31.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 45

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 66 (est.)77
    Reviews found online6771

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 70.9 = 74

    No road tests of treadwear for EUROALL SEASON AS200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    EUROALL SEASON AS200 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Reviews found online6865
  8. 52

    Efficiency

    EUROALL SEASON AS200 +28
    24
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 14 tests5224
Scores at a glance
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS200Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Relative Score 68 70
Dry 65 66
Wet 73 77
Snow 64 65
Comfort 68 67
Noise – 45
Treadwear 67 74
Handling (owners) 68 65
Efficiency 52 24

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

EUROALL SEASON AS200

± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS200EUROALL SEASON AS210ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% #7/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 66% #7/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #2/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 88% #5/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 89% #8/11 · 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 95% #5/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 78% #5/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #5/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 85% #7/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 96% #7/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 74% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/11 · 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test 98% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 74% #7/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 50% #9/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/8 2018 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test #9/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS200

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to premium brands
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Tires can feel soft or lose traction easily in very hot summer temperatures
  • Minor tendencies toward understeer when pushed hard
  • Some reports of faster tread wear or deformation over time
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS200 review

Tire B EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available292
Rim diameters15″ – 16″13″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Narrow edge: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 scores 52 vs 24 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 74 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 77 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
Tire B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS200 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 74 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200, 52 vs 24 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology