Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Firestone Multihawk 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 0 road tests and 1,272 + 182 owner reviews. How we score

EUROALL SEASON AS210 is ahead, 71–44

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,272 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +17
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests66≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6437

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.3 = 48

    No road tests of dry for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +33
    44
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests82≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online7033

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.4 = 77

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 50.3 (est.) + 40% × 33.4 = 44

    No road tests of wet for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests64–
    Reviews found online66–

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.3 = 65

  4. 67

    Comfort

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +24
    43
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests78≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6131

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.7 = 67

    Multihawk 2: 40% × 61.1 (est.) + 60% × 31.1 = 43

    No road tests of comfort for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 48

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests36–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 48

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +32
    43
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests77≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online7229

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 28.8 = 43

    No road tests of treadwear for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +29
    37
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2
    Reviews found online6637
  8. 20

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests20–
Scores at a glance
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Firestone Multihawk 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Firestone Multihawk 2
Relative Score 71 44
Dry 65 48
Wet 77 44
Snow 65 –
Comfort 67 43
Noise 48 –
Treadwear 75 43
Handling (owners) 66 37
Efficiency 20 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 8

Multihawk 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS210Multihawk 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 #12/14 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B Multihawk 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry grip and handling performance
  • High ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Affordable price and good overall value

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and dangerous sliding behavior in rain
  • Pronounced understeer on wet surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the Multihawk 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Firestone Multihawk 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Firestone Multihawk 2
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9222
Rim diameters13″ – 20″13″ – 14″
Sizes in common1212

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Firestone Multihawk 2

Winner: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 77 vs 44 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 75 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 66 vs 37 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 67 vs 43 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire B · Firestone Multihawk 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Multihawk 2?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Multihawk 2?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Multihawk 2?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 65 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Multihawk 2?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 67 vs 43 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Multihawk 2?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology