tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 15 road tests and 1,276 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: EUROALL SEASON AS210 69, MultiSeason Gen 02 68.

Check price on Amazon · EUROALL SEASON AS210 Check price on Amazon · MultiSeason Gen 02
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,276 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
Tire BFirestone

MultiSeason Gen 02

All Season

± 6

Tests 66 · 15 tests Owners 70 · 13 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 7 tests that measured dry braking for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 5 and MultiSeason Gen 02 won 2 (average 91% vs 91% of the best).
  • In 7 tests that measured wet braking for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 2 and MultiSeason Gen 02 won 5 (average 92% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 4 and MultiSeason Gen 02 won 0 (average 97% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured snow braking for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 1 and MultiSeason Gen 02 won 2 (average 91% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured noise for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 2 and MultiSeason Gen 02 won 2 (average 98% vs 98% of the best).
  1. 65

    Dry

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 14 tests6667
    Reviews found online6470
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 5–291%91%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–199%99%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 70.2 = 68

  2. 77

    Wet

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +1
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 14 tests8281
    Reviews found online7172
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%78%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–097%93%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 2–592%93%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%95%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–297%96%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.5 = 77

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 72 = 78

  3. 65

    Snow

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 7 tests6473
    Reviews found online6666
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–188%92%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–291%93%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–296%97%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–389%92%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.3 = 65

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 65.7 = 70

  4. 67

    Comfort

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +7
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests7748
    Reviews found online6168

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.7 = 67

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 40% × 48.1 + 60% × 67.6 = 60

  5. 48

    Noise

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +14
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 7 tests3659
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–298%98%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 48

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 58.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +17
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 6 tests7752
    Reviews found online7269
    Abrasion (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–079%60%
    Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–081%78%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

    MultiSeason Gen 02: 60% × 51.6 + 40% × 68.6 = 58

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02
    Reviews found online6673
  8. 20

    Efficiency

    MultiSeason Gen 02 +57
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 7 tests2077
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–294%97%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–379%90%
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
Relative Score 69 68
Dry 65 68
Wet 77 78
Snow 65 70
Comfort 67 60
Noise 48 62
Treadwear 75 58
Handling (owners) 66 73
Efficiency 20 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 6

MultiSeason Gen 02

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 8 tests that ran both, Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 finished ahead 6 times and Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 2 times.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS210MultiSeason Gen 02ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 91% 91% 0.0 5–2 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% +0.4 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 94% 78% +16.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 93% +4.1 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 92% 93% −1.0 2–5 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 96% 95% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 97% 96% +0.5 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16
Ice Braking Snow 88% 92% −4.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 91% 93% −2.2 1–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Handling Snow 96% 97% −1.1 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16
Snow Traction Snow 89% 92% −2.8 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 98% 98% −0.3 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Abrasion Treadwear 79% 60% +19.0 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 81% 78% +2.8 3–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 94% 97% −3.1 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 79% 90% −10.3 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 82% 78% +4.2 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #14/15 #2/15 – 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16
Value Cost 80% 76% +3.6 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16
Tyre Weight Other 90% 94% −4.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #7/16 #8/16 – 6–2 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B MultiSeason Gen 02

Pros

  • Strong wet-weather grip and confidence in rain, mentioned by several reviewers
  • Good cold-weather and light-snow performance, with some users reporting no problems on snowy or icy roads at temperatures down to -10°C
  • Good dry grip and braking, with a planted, smooth feel and stable high-speed directional stability

Cons

  • Road noise is the most frequent complaint, noted by several reviewers; one says it becomes slightly noisy above 120 km/h
  • Reduced performance in extreme conditions, including poor braking in hot, dry weather above about 30°C and weak grip and stability in heavy snow and ice for some users
  • Durability concerns from a minority, including one report of dry rotting and winter performance becoming undrivable after about 25,000 km
All owner themes in the MultiSeason Gen 02 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·13 upvotes ·2021-08-19

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available92—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Too close to call: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 and Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 are within 2 points overall. Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 is stronger on efficiency, noise and handling.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 scores 77 vs 20 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 75 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 scores 62 vs 48 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 67 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02?

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02, 68 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02?

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02, 70 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02?

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02, 62 vs 48 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 67 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or MultiSeason Gen 02?

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02, 77 vs 20 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology