Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 8 road tests and 1,272 + 3,043 owner reviews. How we score

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,272 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Tire BGoodyear

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

All Season

± 5

Tests 76 · 8 tests Owners 67 · 3,043 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +8
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 8 tests6657
    Reviews found online6458
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–090%89%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%99%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 56.9 + 40% × 58.1 = 57

  2. 77

    Wet

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +5
    82
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 8 tests8288
    Reviews found online7073
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%95%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–291%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%100%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.4 = 77

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 87.9 + 40% × 72.6 = 82

  3. 65

    Snow

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +13
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 6 tests6484
    Reviews found online6667
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%98%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%99%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.3 = 65

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 67.3 = 78

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests78≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6166

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.7 = 67

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.2 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Vector 4Seasons Gen-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 48

    Noise

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +24
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 5 tests3675
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%97%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 48

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 3 tests7777
    Reviews found online7270
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–088%85%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 70.3 = 74

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
    Reviews found online6663
  8. 20

    Efficiency

    Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 +54
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 6 tests2074
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–182%87%
Scores at a glance
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
Relative Score 69 71
Dry 65 57
Wet 77 82
Snow 65 78
Comfort 67 67
Noise 48 72
Treadwear 75 74
Handling (owners) 66 63
Efficiency 20 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 5

Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 finished ahead 0 times and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 4 times.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS210Vector 4Seasons Gen-2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% 89% +1.2 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% +0.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 99% 95% +3.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Wet Braking Wet 91% 98% −6.6 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 96% 100% −4.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Snow Braking Snow 96% 98% −2.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Snow Handling Snow 100% 99% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Noise Noise 95% 97% −1.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Wear Treadwear 88% 85% +2.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 82% 87% −4.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 86% 77% +9.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #5/10 #3/10 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Value Cost 100% 87% +13.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Overall Ranking Overall #11/31 #5/31 – 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview · 225/45 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and safety in wet, rainy, and standing water conditions
  • Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow, ice, and cold winter weather
  • Comfortable, smooth, and relatively quiet ride quality

Cons

  • Reduced dry-weather performance and softer handling response in warm temperatures (above 20°C)
  • Prone to wheel spin, understeer, and tread squal when pushed hard or during aggressive starts in dry conditions
  • Vague or floaty steering feel on twisty roads or at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9234
Rim diameters13″ – 20″13″ – 20″
Sizes in common3030

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

Narrow edge: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 — better efficiency, noise and snow. Pick the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 74 vs 20 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 72 vs 48 on noise.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 scores 78 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 65 vs 57 on dry.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire B · Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 82 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 65 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 78 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 72 vs 48 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Vector 4Seasons Gen-2?

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, 74 vs 20 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology