tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 13 road tests and 1,272 + 120 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate+ is ahead, 79–69

Check price on Amazon · CrossClimate+ or EUROALL SEASON AS210 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,272 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate+

All Season

± 5

Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 120 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 7 tests that measured dry braking for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 0 and CrossClimate+ won 7 (average 92% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 7 tests that measured wet braking for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 0 and CrossClimate+ won 7 (average 91% vs 95% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured dry handling for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 0 and CrossClimate+ won 4 (average 99% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 5 and CrossClimate+ won 0 (average 96% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured wet handling for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 2 and CrossClimate+ won 3 (average 97% vs 98% of the best).
  1. 65

    Dry

    CrossClimate+ +22
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 13 tests6694
    Reviews found online6477
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 0–792%99%
    Dry Braking (cool) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–192%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–499%99%
    Dry Handling (cool) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 77.4 = 87

  2. 77

    Wet

    CrossClimate+ +4
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 13 tests8281
    Reviews found online7181
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–096%93%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 0–791%95%
    Wet Braking (cool) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–182%95%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–397%98%
    Wet Handling (cool) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%100%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.5 = 77

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 81.2 = 81

  3. 65

    Snow

    CrossClimate+ +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 9 tests6465
    Reviews found online6673
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–193%91%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–198%97%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–196%97%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.4 = 65

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 65.1 + 40% × 72.8 = 68

  4. 67

    Comfort

    CrossClimate+ +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7771
    Reviews found online6177

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.6 = 67

    CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77 = 75

  5. 48

    Noise

    CrossClimate+ +19
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 9 tests3668
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–597%99%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 48

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate+ +7
    82
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 3 tests7783
    Reviews found online7280
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–289%97%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 82

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate+ +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+
    Reviews found online6672
  8. 20

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate+ +54
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 8 tests2074
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–584%92%
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Michelin CrossClimate+
Relative Score 69 79
Dry 65 87
Wet 77 81
Snow 65 68
Comfort 67 75
Noise 48 67
Treadwear 75 82
Handling (owners) 66 72
Efficiency 20 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 5

CrossClimate+

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 10 tests that ran both, Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin CrossClimate+ 10 times.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate+ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% 99% −7.0 0–7 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Braking (cool) Dry 92% 96% −3.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% −0.4 0–4 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling (cool) Dry 99% 100% −0.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% 93% +3.8 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 91% 95% −4.0 0–7 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking (cool) Wet 82% 95% −13.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 97% 98% −0.6 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling (cool) Wet 96% 100% −3.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 93% 91% +1.7 4–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Handling Snow 98% 97% +0.7 3–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Traction Snow 96% 97% −0.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 97% 99% −2.5 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 89% 97% −7.7 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 84% 92% −8.2 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 88% 67% +20.8 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #8/14 #3/14 – 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 99% 83% +16.0 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #6/10 #5/10 – 0–10 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Allrad All-Season Tire Test R16 · 215/60R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B CrossClimate+

Pros

  • Strong snow and cold-weather traction for an all-season tyre, with many owners reporting winter-tyre-like confidence on snow, slush and hills, including on front-wheel-drive cars.
  • Excellent dry handling and steering response with precise, summer-tyre-like feel, along with generally very good wet grip and braking.
  • Long tread life: many reports of 30,000–55,000+ km or miles with low wear, including taxi and van use and 4-year/50,000-mile ownership.

Cons

  • Performance degradation with age: several owners report grip (wet and snow), noise and ride deteriorating after about 1–2 years, with hardening or cracking of the rubber in some cases.
  • Limitations on ice, packed snow and deep or steep snow, where some owners found them inferior to dedicated winter tyres or to rivals such as the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
  • Wet-weather concerns for some, including aquaplaning, being pulled around by standing water, and scary steering feel as the tyres aged.
All owner themes in the CrossClimate+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·13 upvotes ·2021-08-19

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Michelin CrossClimate+
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9263
Rim diameters13″ – 20″13″ – 19″
Sizes in common5151

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Michelin CrossClimate+

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better efficiency, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 74 vs 20 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 67 vs 48 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is straight aquaplaning

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 5 of 5 shared straight aquaplaning tests.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate+
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 68 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 67 vs 48 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 75 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 74 vs 20 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology