Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Michelin CrossClimate — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 2 road tests and 1,272 + 152 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate is ahead, 74–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,272 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Michelin CrossClimate
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate

All Season

± 6

Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 152 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    CrossClimate +11
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 2 tests6678
    Reviews found online6474

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

    CrossClimate: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 73.5 = 76

  2. 77

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 2 tests8275
    Reviews found online7178

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.5 = 77

    CrossClimate: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 76

  3. 65

    Snow

    CrossClimate +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 2 tests6471
    Reviews found online6665

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.4 = 65

    CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 65.4 = 69

  4. 67

    Comfort

    CrossClimate +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests77≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6176

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.6 = 67

    CrossClimate: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.7 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for CrossClimate. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 48

    Noise

    CrossClimate +21
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 1 tests3671
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 48

    CrossClimate: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7774
    Reviews found online7275

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

    CrossClimate: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 75 = 74

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate
    Reviews found online6673
  8. 20

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate +56
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 2 tests2076
Scores at a glance
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Michelin CrossClimate: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Michelin CrossClimate
Relative Score 69 74
Dry 65 76
Wet 77 76
Snow 65 69
Comfort 67 73
Noise 48 69
Treadwear 75 74
Handling (owners) 66 73
Efficiency 20 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 6

CrossClimate

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS210CrossClimateΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 85% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 99% #2/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 88% #5/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 90% #7/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 91% #5/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 94% #4/11 · 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 89% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 87% #9/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 96% #4/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 96% #4/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 91% #5/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 74% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 99% #2/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test 100% #1/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 66% #12/16 · 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test 91% #4/10 · 2017 All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 74% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 100% #1/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #14/15 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test #4/10 2017 All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 62% #4/15 · 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 65% #8/10 · 2017 All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #9/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 #9/9 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B CrossClimate

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable traction in light snow and cold conditions

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and retain small stones in the tread pattern
  • Noticeable drop in performance as tread depth decreases
  • Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the CrossClimate review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Michelin CrossClimate
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available92—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Michelin CrossClimate

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate — better efficiency, noise and dry. Where the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 20 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate scores 69 vs 48 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate scores 73 vs 66 on handling.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 76 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 69 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 69 vs 48 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 73 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 20 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology