tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 19 + 5 road tests and 1,272 + 980 owner reviews. How we score

EUROALL SEASON AS210 is ahead, 69–60

Check price on Amazon · EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,272 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”

Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth-4S AW21

All Season

± 8

Tests 58 · 5 tests Owners 63 · 980 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 16 in 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 2 and BluEarth-4S AW21 won 1 (average 91% vs 89% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, EUROALL SEASON AS210 won 3 and BluEarth-4S AW21 won 0 (average 92% vs 89% of the best).
  1. 65

    Dry

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 5 tests6655
    Reviews found online6465
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–191%89%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 54.5 + 40% × 65.4 = 59

  2. 77

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 5 tests8271
    Reviews found online7071
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%78%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%91%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–092%89%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%91%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.4 = 77

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 70.8 = 71

  3. 65

    Snow

    BluEarth-4S AW21 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 2 tests6466
    Reviews found online6668
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–088%85%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–188%95%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–185%91%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.3 = 65

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 67.7 = 67

  4. 67

    Comfort

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests78≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6161

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.7 = 67

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.6 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth-4S AW21. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 48

    Noise

    BluEarth-4S AW21 +5
    53
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 2 tests3643
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%98%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 48

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 43.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 53

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +26
    49
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7748
    Reviews found online7251
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–070%57%
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–066%56%

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

    BluEarth-4S AW21: 60% × 47.6 + 40% × 51.1 = 49

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21
    Reviews found online6661
  8. 20

    Efficiency

    BluEarth-4S AW21 +22
    42
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 2 tests2042
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%95%
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
Relative Score 69 60
Dry 65 59
Wet 77 71
Snow 65 67
Comfort 67 63
Noise 48 53
Treadwear 75 49
Handling (owners) 66 61
Efficiency 20 42

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

± 8

BluEarth-4S AW21

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 finished ahead 3 times and Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS210BluEarth-4S AW21ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 91% 89% +2.1 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 94% 78% +16.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% 91% +7.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 92% 89% +3.1 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 96% 91% +5.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Ice Braking Snow 88% 85% +2.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 88% 95% −7.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Traction Snow 85% 91% −5.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 98% 98% −0.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Abrasion Treadwear 70% 57% +13.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 66% 56% +10.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% 95% +1.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Tyre Weight Other 90% 78% +11.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #7/16 #14/16 – 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

Tire B BluEarth-4S AW21

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability on wet and flooded roads
  • Strong traction and confidence-inspiring performance in snow and ice
  • Good value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher road noise levels ('howling' or noticeable hum) compared to some other brands
  • Softer cornering feel and reduced precision during hot summer months
  • Minor negative impact on fuel economy for some drivers
All owner themes in the BluEarth-4S AW21 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·1 upvote ·2022-09-08

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available92104
Rim diameters13″ – 20″14″ – 22″
Sizes in common7171

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21

Winner: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 if efficiency and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 75 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 scores 42 vs 20 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 65 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 77 vs 71 on wet.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 65 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21, 53 vs 48 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 49 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EUROALL SEASON AS210 or BluEarth-4S AW21?

Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21, 42 vs 20 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology