Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 30 reviews
Falken FK453 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 30 + 3,619 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 85–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 3,619 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2985Why this score
Source FK453 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 50 85 FK453: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 84.7 = 85
No road tests of dry for FK453. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2989Why this score
Source FK453 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 56 85 FK453: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 85.1 = 89
No road tests of wet for FK453. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2681Why this score
Source FK453 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 91 Reviews found online 49 74 FK453: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 48.8 = 55
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 90.6 + 60% × 73.9 = 81
No road tests of comfort for FK453. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source FK453 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 73 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
51
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2778Why this score
Source FK453 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 41 71 FK453: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 51
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 71 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for FK453. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
45
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +3984Why this score
Source FK453 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Reviews found online 45 84 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison61Why this score
Source FK453 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK453 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 85 |
| Dry | 56 | 85 |
| Wet | 60 | 89 |
| Comfort | 55 | 81 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 51 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 45 | 84 |
| Efficiency | – | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
FK453
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | FK453 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/8 2016 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | #3/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK453
Pros
- Strong dry weather traction and cornering grip
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Aesthetically pleasing sidewall design
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, particularly on rear axles
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise
- Unstable handling characteristics at high speeds
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Precise steering response and high-speed stability
- Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
- Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken FK453
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
“I have them fitted in both my cars (Audi A6 and CLK350). Neither had the performance of your AMG but I can confirm they are the best tyres I’ve ever had in terms of grip and feel.”
Based on 13 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK453 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 A - AA A | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken FK453
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 84 vs 45 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 85 vs 56 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 89 vs 60 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 78 vs 51 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK453 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Which is better in the wet, FK453 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 89 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK453 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 85 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, FK453 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 81 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, FK453 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 78 vs 51 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology