Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK510 SUV vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 23 road tests and 9 + 6,449 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 87–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK510 SUV
Tire AFalken

FK510 SUV

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

Summer

± 4

Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,449 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 5 +17
    92
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVPilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 23 tests8293
    Reviews found online6691

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 82 + 40% × 65.6 = 75

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 90.8 = 92

  2. 77

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 5 +17
    94
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVPilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 23 tests8194
    Reviews found online7294

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 71.8 = 77

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 93.6 = 94

  3. 61

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 5 +18
    79
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVPilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests6271
    Reviews found online6185

    FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.5 + 60% × 61 = 61

    Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 71 + 60% × 84.8 = 79

  4. 71

    Noise

    FK510 SUV +24
    47
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVPilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 15 tests7433
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 47

    No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV or Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 59

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 5 +28
    87
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVPilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 62 (est.)92
    Reviews found online5579

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 78.9 = 87

    No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 5 +21
    89
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVPilot Sport 5
    Reviews found online6889
  7. 44

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 5 +20
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVPilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 17 tests4464
Scores at a glance
Falken FK510 SUV vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK510 SUVMichelin Pilot Sport 5
Relative Score 71 87
Dry 75 92
Wet 77 94
Comfort 61 79
Noise 71 47
Treadwear 59 87
Handling (owners) 68 89
Efficiency 44 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

FK510 SUV

± 4

Pilot Sport 5

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryFK510 SUVPilot Sport 5ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 95% #10/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 99% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 100% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 91% #4/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test 87% #6/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #6/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 94% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 91% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 97% #5/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 67% #4/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 67% #6/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 90% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 100% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 87% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 76% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 92% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 74% #7/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 56% #13/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #3/10 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test #9/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK510 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
  • Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
  • Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
All owner themes in the FK510 SUV review

Tire B Pilot Sport 5

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
  • Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
  • Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken FK510 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Positive

The community generally views the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 as an exceptional daily-driving tire that bridges the gap between high performance and everyday comfort. Users frequently praise its outstanding wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to more track-focused alternatives like the PS4S. However, some enthusiast drivers feel the sidewalls and feedback can feel a bit numb or soft for aggressive track use, noting it is built more for sporty road use than dedicated circuit driving.

f30.bimmerpost.com

“I've used the PS4S, potenza s001's & sports contact 7. Currently on Pilot Sport 5's and I think they're the best all road "do it all"road tyre I've had on my RWD . The asymmetric 6 is also supposed to be great but I havent tried that.”

r/AudiA5 ·1 upvote ·2026-04-30

“I had PS5’s on they were great literally all the grip you could ever want (not a very powerful car) and they have an incredibly long life span, I didn’t find them loud at all and i also now have an Audi a5 coupe and the car itself blocks out most noise especially if you have music on so it’s not something you should worry about, I know the Asym6 have more grip but it’s marginal I’d personally get the ps5’s just because of the beautiful side wall!”

r/i20n ·17 upvotes ·2025-07-21

“Tyres: Ps5’s initial impression Tyres seem to be a common question across a few forums so I thought ide share. So after 12 months (27,000kms) with my i20n, I was (over) due to replace my tyres. While I loved the p-zeros, I wasn’t keen on the short life, so went with the pilot sport 5. My impressions as follows: Initial impression: a lot less road noise than the p-zero City drive: no noticeable difference (apart from the reduced noise) Highway drive: handling is not noticeably changed, but the reduced noise is really appreciated here! Twisty’s: the difference here is notable, ps5’s don’t provide quite the same aggressive limitless grip feel as the p-zeros. Still holds the line perfectly but noted a bit of slip on the inside front wheel under heavy throttle. I do approx 100km on back roads commuting to and from work every day, so I’ll update this thread if I find anything worth reporting Read more”

Top themes
#Wet grip and safety#Tread life and durability#Road noise and comfort#Daily driving performance#Soft sidewall feedback#Comparison to PS4S and competitors#Value and pricing

Based on 177 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK510 SUV B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4866
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″ – 22″
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK510 SUV

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better treadwear, handling and efficiency. Pick the Falken FK510 SUV if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 87 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken FK510 SUV scores 71 vs 47 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 64 vs 44 on efficiency.

Tire A · Falken FK510 SUV
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK510 SUV or Pilot Sport 5?

Which is better in the wet, FK510 SUV or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK510 SUV or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, FK510 SUV or Pilot Sport 5?

Falken FK510 SUV, 71 vs 47 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, FK510 SUV or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 79 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FK510 SUV or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 87 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, FK510 SUV or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 64 vs 44 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology