tirewheelguide

Falken SN828 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken SN828 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 9 + 1,871 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 91–52

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or SN828 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken SN828
Tire AFalken

SN828

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 9 reviews

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Summer

± 4

Tests 94 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,871 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +38
    95
    Why this score
    SourceSN828Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 30 tests≈ 61 (est.)96
    Reviews found online5292

    SN828: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.1 + 40% × 92.1 = 95

    No road tests of dry for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 52

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +41
    93
    Why this score
    SourceSN828Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests≈ 57 (est.)94
    Reviews found online4692

    SN828: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 52

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 93.6 + 40% × 91.7 = 93

    No road tests of wet for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +22
    79
    Why this score
    SourceSN828Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 66 (est.)76
    Reviews found online5181

    SN828: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 51 = 57

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 76.2 + 60% × 81.3 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for SN828. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    83
    Why this score
    SourceSN828Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests–94
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 94 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 83

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 48

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +38
    86
    Why this score
    SourceSN828Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 56 (est.)97
    Reviews found online3769

    SN828: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.5 + 40% × 69.1 = 86

    No road tests of treadwear for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 38

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +52
    90
    Why this score
    SourceSN828Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Reviews found online3890
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSN828Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests–72
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken SN828Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Relative Score 52 91
Dry 57 95
Wet 52 93
Comfort 57 79
Noise – 83
Treadwear 48 86
Handling (owners) 38 90
Efficiency – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SN828

± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SN828

Pros

  • High value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong dry weather traction
  • Comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
  • Subpar tread life and durability
All owner themes in the SN828 review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip with predictable, progressive behavior at the limit
  • Significantly lower road noise and improved ride comfort compared to run-flats and predecessors
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and agile turn-in response

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or short lifespan reported by some aggressive drivers
  • Softer sidewalls can induce a slightly squishy or floaty feeling during hard, high-speed cornering
  • Occasional complaints about loud resonance or road noise on rough or concrete asphalt surfaces
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken SN828

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Positive

Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is largely positive, with drivers praising its high performance, dry and wet road manners, competitive pricing, and overall capability as a daily and spirited driving tyre. Some users raise concerns regarding ride firmness, high-speed vibration issues, rapid wear under track conditions, and compromised grip in cold wet temperatures as noted in Scandinavian testing. Compatibility discussions also frequently centre on EV suitability, Porsche N-ratings, and rim protection markings.

r/TyreReviews ·1 upvote ·2026-08-22

“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-12-06

“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
taycanforum.com ·2026-04-05

“Ah, now I remember -- available in the Taycan staggered 21" but not 20". (Some of these staggered setups seem like a conspiracy to induce madness via tire model available! Our i4 is the same way...)”
Top themes
#Wet and dry performance#Comparison with Michelin#Ride comfort and noise#Wear and durability#EV readiness and fitment#Value and pricing

Based on 28 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken SN828 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—130
Rim diameters—17″ – 23″
Tread depth—7 - 9/32″
UTQG—260 - 300 AA A
Treadwear warranty—30,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken SN828

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken SN828 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 38 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 93 vs 52 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 95 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 86 vs 48 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken SN828
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SN828 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Which is better in the wet, SN828 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 93 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SN828 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 95 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SN828 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SN828 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 48 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology