Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 99 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force R1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZE914 vs BFGoodrich g-Force R1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 99 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZE914 g-Force R1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) – Reviews found online 81 – ZE914: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 81 = 77
No road tests of dry for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZE914 g-Force R1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) – Reviews found online 80 – ZE914: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 77
No road tests of wet for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZE914 g-Force R1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 75 – ZE914: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.9 = 73
No road tests of comfort for ZE914. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZE914 g-Force R1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 75 – ZE914: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
78
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZE914 g-Force R1 Reviews found online 78 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZE914 | BFGoodrich g-Force R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | – |
| Dry | 77 | – |
| Wet | 77 | – |
| Comfort | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
ZE914
–
/ 100
g-Force R1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZE914
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
Tire B g-Force R1
Pros
- Superior cornering stability and reduced understeer
- High levels of mechanical grip during braking and cornering
- Predictable and gradual breakaway characteristics
Cons
- Susceptible to overheating when pushed at extreme limits (9+/10 intensity)
- Limited longevity typical of dedicated track-focused rubber
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE914 | B · BFGoodrich g-Force R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Trackday and Competition Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Falken ZE914
–
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force R1
Only Falken ZE914 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Falken ZE914
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force R1
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology