Head-to-head Updated

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 3 + 910 owner reviews. How we score

Ziez ZE950 AS is ahead, 75–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
Tire AFalken

Ziez ZE950 AS

All Season High Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 3 reviews

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HT RH12

All-Season tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Ziez ZE950 AS +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8167

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 76

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Ziez ZE950 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Ziez ZE950 AS +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7866

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 76

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Ziez ZE950 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 77

    Snow

    Ziez ZE950 AS +17
    60
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8153

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 77

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Ziez ZE950 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Ziez ZE950 AS +8
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8266

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 81.5 = 75

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Ziez ZE950 AS or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–75

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Ziez ZE950 AS +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)64
    Reviews found online6864

    Ziez ZE950 AS: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Ziez ZE950 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    Ziez ZE950 AS +15
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZiez ZE950 ASDynapro HT RH12
    Reviews found online8065
Scores at a glance
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Ziez ZE950 ASHankook Dynapro HT RH12
Relative Score 75 65
Dry 76 67
Wet 76 67
Snow 77 60
Comfort 75 67
Noise – 70
Treadwear 67 64
Handling (owners) 80 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ziez ZE950 AS

Dynapro HT RH12

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ziez ZE950 AS

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise levels

Cons

  • Limited tread life warranty compared to some competitors
  • Potential trade-off between handling performance and longevity
All owner themes in the Ziez ZE950 AS review

Tire B Dynapro HT RH12

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Positive

Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”

r/denverlist ·2025-12-09

“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”

ridgelineownersclub.com ·2012-10-28

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresAll-Season tire
Sizes available—24
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—14/32″
Treadwear warranty—40,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—54 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Winner: Falken Ziez ZE950 AS — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken Ziez ZE950 AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 77 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 80 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 76 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 76 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ziez ZE950 AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Which is better in the wet, Ziez ZE950 AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 76 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ziez ZE950 AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 76 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ziez ZE950 AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 77 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Ziez ZE950 AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 75 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ziez ZE950 AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Falken Ziez ZE950 AS, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology