Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1,457 + 693 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk Indy 500 leads, 65–61 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Firehawk Indy 500 +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ventus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7860

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74

    Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ventus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6566

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67

    Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 44

    Snow

    Ventus S1 noble2 +9
    53
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ventus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online2843

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.7 = 44

    Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 43 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Firehawk Indy 500 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ventus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6463

    Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.4 = 66

    Ventus S1 noble2: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.9 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk Indy 500 or Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ventus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Firehawk Indy 500 +13
    53
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ventus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6144

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66

    Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk Indy 500 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ventus S1 noble2
    Reviews found online7163
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Hankook Ventus S1 noble2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk Indy 500Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
Relative Score 65 61
Dry 74 62
Wet 67 67
Snow 44 53
Comfort 66 65
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 66 53
Handling (owners) 71 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Firehawk Indy 500

± 7

Ventus S1 noble2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk Indy 500

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
  • Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
  • Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
All owner themes in the Firehawk Indy 500 review

Tire B Ventus S1 noble2

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway cruising
  • Strong dry traction and responsive handling

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, frequently failing to meet mileage expectations
  • Poor traction and dangerous handling in snow, slush, and ice
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering response or 'squishy' cornering feel
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 noble2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising it as an exceptional value and budget-friendly alternative to premium summer tires. Owners report strong dry grip, solid wet-weather traction, good comfort, and predictable handling, though some note reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer sidewalls, and a tendency to get greasy during aggressive track sessions. Interest is also growing around the newer V2 version and its updated compound and tread design.

r/Mustang ·7 upvotes ·2025-02-13

“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”

r/Miata ·1 upvote ·2026-10-07

“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”

forum.miata.net

“I had them on wifes old MR2 spyder, drove great. deep tread and quiet, did not exhibit any bad behavior and held well at high speed on ramps, ect....great in wet weather and were by far the longest lasting tire I ever had on that car, yokohamas would burn down in 15-20k miles in rear and staggered so no rotates. different beast, I know but the tires on a miata should easily go 40-50k.”

Top themes
#value and pricing#dry grip and traction#wet weather handling#track and autocross use#cold temperature limitations#ride comfort and road noise#Firehawk Indy 500 V2

Based on 146 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus S1 noble2

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its competitive price-to-performance value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Drivers frequently commend its quiet ride, wet grip, and respectable tread life, though some note reduced handling sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires and increased road noise after higher mileage.

Top themes
#value and price affordability#quiet and comfortable ride#treadwear and longevity#wet weather traction#all-season vs summer performance#comparison to premium brands

Based on 36 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 B · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
CategorySummerAll-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available478
Rim diameters16″ – 20″17″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG340 A A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Hankook Ventus S1 noble2

Narrow edge: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better treadwear, dry and handling. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 53 vs 44 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 71 vs 63 on handling.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk Indy 500 or Ventus S1 noble2?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ventus S1 noble2?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ventus S1 noble2?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ventus S1 noble2?

Hankook Ventus S1 noble2, 53 vs 44 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ventus S1 noble2?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ventus S1 noble2?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology