tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone RoadHawk vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 17 + 0 road tests and 644 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 72–62

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or RoadHawk on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone RoadHawk
Tire AFirestone

RoadHawk

Summer

Tests 70 · 17 tests Owners 48 · 644 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / – tests82≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5277

    RoadHawk: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 52.2 = 70

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests76≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5675

    RoadHawk: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 55.5 = 68

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–62

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +13
    72
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4675

    RoadHawk: 60% × 67 + 40% × 46.4 = 59

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 45

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +25
    70
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests30≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)73

    RoadHawk: 60% × 30.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 45

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for RoadHawk. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests65≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3775

    RoadHawk: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 37.1 = 54

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 43

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +28
    71
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online4371
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone RoadHawkHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 62 72
Dry 70 73
Wet 68 74
Snow – 65
Comfort 59 72
Noise 45 70
Treadwear 54 71
Handling (owners) 43 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

RoadHawk

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryRoadHawkDynaPro A/TM RF10ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/55 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A RoadHawk

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance, particularly in standing water and heavy rain
  • Strong dry grip and confident cornering for daily driving
  • Comfortable ride quality with good bump absorption

Cons

  • Accelerated and sometimes uneven tread wear, resulting in shorter-than-expected lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a visual 'under-inflated' bulge and spongy cornering response
  • Limited steering feedback and precision during spirited driving
All owner themes in the RoadHawk review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone RoadHawk

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed perspectives on the Firestone Roadhawk, noting reasonable reviews alongside concerns regarding tread wear. While some test results place it competitively among budget-friendly summer options, owners also discuss practical issues such as unusual noises, generational replacement difficulties, and overall value.

r/automobil ·2025-11-20

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2023-09-18

“Not sure if it is what you are looking for. I am Polish but I live in the USA. I am still following info from Poland but I am not buying tires there anymore. A magazine Motor tests tires. magazynauto.pl Firestone was included in their "accessibly priced" summer tires: Firestone Roadhawk. They lost to Uniroyal, Semperit, Dębica but were ahead of Kumho, Apollo, Tomket, Imperial and Double Coin. They were not included in their premium and middle priced test. German based Auto Bild (and its Polish version Auto Świat) did a test in 2019 and the same Roadhawk passed the elimination test (53 down to 20: wet and dry braking distances added together as #13) and finished #18 in detailed test. So Firestone is present in Poland and Europe as a cheaper brand from Bridgestone but how popular it is I do not know. Krzyś”
Top themes
#tread wear concerns#budget tire test results#replacement availability issues#generation differences#driving noise symptoms

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone RoadHawk B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategorySummerAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available11529
Rim diameters15″ – 21″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone RoadHawk

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, noise and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 70 vs 45 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone RoadHawk
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

RoadHawk or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, RoadHawk or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, RoadHawk or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, RoadHawk or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 45 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, RoadHawk or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, RoadHawk or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology