Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews
General Grabber AT2 vs General Grabber X3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 86 + 119 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber AT2 leads, 67–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 119 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Grabber X3 +268Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 69 Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
Grabber X3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
63
Wet
Grabber X3 +669Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 60 69 Grabber AT2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63
Grabber X3: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
Grabber AT2 +269Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 68 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71
Grabber X3: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Grabber AT2 +1257Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 69 51 Grabber AT2: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.9 = 69
Grabber X3: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.2 = 57
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Grabber AT2 +559Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 47 Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 64
Grabber X3: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59
No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Grabber AT2 +865Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 78 63 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 73
Grabber X3: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Grabber AT2 +853Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Grabber X3 Reviews found online 61 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber AT2 | General Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 65 |
| Dry | 66 | 68 |
| Wet | 63 | 69 |
| Snow | 71 | 69 |
| Comfort | 69 | 57 |
| Noise | 64 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber AT2
Grabber X3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber AT2
Pros
- Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
- Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
- Long-lasting tread life and durability
Cons
- Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
- Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
- Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
Tire B Grabber X3
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
- Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
- Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering
Cons
- Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
- Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
- Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber AT2 | B · General Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 18 - 21/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A B | AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Grabber AT2
General Grabber X3
Narrow edge: General Grabber AT2 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the General Grabber X3 if wet matters most to you.
General Grabber AT2 scores 69 vs 57 on comfort.
General Grabber AT2 scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.
General Grabber AT2 scores 61 vs 53 on handling.
General Grabber X3 scores 69 vs 63 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?
General Grabber X3, 69 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?
General Grabber AT2, 64 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?
General Grabber AT2, 69 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?
General Grabber AT2, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology