Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber AT2 vs General Grabber X3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 86 + 119 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber AT2 leads, 67–65 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber AT2
Tire AGeneral

Grabber AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews

General Grabber X3
Tire BGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Grabber X3 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Grabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6569

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    Grabber X3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Grabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6069

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Snow

    Grabber AT2 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Grabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7168

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Grabber AT2 +12
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Grabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6951

    Grabber AT2: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.9 = 69

    Grabber X3: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.2 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Grabber AT2 +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Grabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6047

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 64

    Grabber X3: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59

    No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Grabber AT2 +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Grabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7863

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 73

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber AT2 +8
    53
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Grabber X3
    Reviews found online6153
Scores at a glance
General Grabber AT2 vs General Grabber X3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber AT2General Grabber X3
Relative Score 67 65
Dry 66 68
Wet 63 69
Snow 71 69
Comfort 69 57
Noise 64 59
Treadwear 73 65
Handling (owners) 61 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber AT2

± 7

Grabber X3

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber AT2

Pros

  • Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
  • Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
  • Long-lasting tread life and durability

Cons

  • Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
  • Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
  • Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
All owner themes in the Grabber AT2 review

Tire B Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber AT2 B · General Grabber X3
CategoryAll-Terrain tireMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available26
Rim diameters16″16″ – 18″
Tread depth14/32″18 - 21/32″
UTQG640 A BAA A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering
Max pressure44 psi35 - 80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber AT2

General Grabber X3

Narrow edge: General Grabber AT2 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the General Grabber X3 if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber AT2 scores 69 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber AT2 scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber AT2 scores 61 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber X3 scores 69 vs 63 on wet.

Tire A · General Grabber AT2
Tire B · General Grabber X3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 69 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?

General Grabber AT2, 64 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?

General Grabber AT2, 69 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber AT2 or Grabber X3?

General Grabber AT2, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology