Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 2 road tests and 251 + 1,647 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Grabber AT3 73, Geolandar A/T G015 74.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber AT3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber AT3

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 251 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)

“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Tire BYokohama

Geolandar A/T G015

All-Terrain tire

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 1,647 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)

“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Geolandar A/T G015 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6674
    Reviews found online7877
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–293%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%99%

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 78 = 71

    Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 76.6 = 75

  2. 72

    Wet

    Geolandar A/T G015 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6869
    Reviews found online7879
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–177%91%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–288%93%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–183%88%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%96%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–185%93%

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 78.2 = 72

    Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 79 = 73

  3. 75

    Snow

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7777
    Reviews found online7373
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–094%91%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–194%97%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%93%

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 73 = 75

    Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 73.4 = 75

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Grabber AT3 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7776

    Grabber AT3: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75

    Geolandar A/T G015: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 76.4 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 72

    Noise

    Geolandar A/T G015 +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7575
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)77
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0100%100%

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 72

    Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 77.4 = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    Grabber AT3 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8277

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 76

    Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber AT3 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015
    Reviews found online7473
  8. 52

    Efficiency

    Geolandar A/T G015 +5
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests5257
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–172%75%
Scores at a glance
General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber AT3Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Relative Score 73 74
Dry 71 75
Wet 72 73
Snow 75 75
Comfort 75 74
Noise 72 76
Treadwear 76 73
Handling (owners) 74 73
Efficiency 52 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber AT3

± 6

Geolandar A/T G015

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, General Grabber AT3 finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 2 times.

DisciplineCategoryGrabber AT3Geolandar A/T G015ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% 95% −2.5 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17
Dry Handling Dry 97% 99% −2.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/60 R18
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 77% 91% −13.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 88% 93% −4.5 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17
Wet Braking Wet 83% 88% −4.5 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17
Wet Circle Wet 97% 96% +0.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17
Wet Handling Wet 85% 93% −7.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/60 R18
Snow Braking Snow 94% 91% +2.3 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17
Snow Handling Snow 94% 97% −3.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/60 R18
Snow Traction Snow 94% 93% +0.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17
Noise Noise 100% 100% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/60 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 72% 75% −3.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/60 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 68% 74% −5.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test · 235/60 R18
Gravel Traction Off-road 94% 94% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #3/8 #1/8 – 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test · 225/65 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber AT3

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
  • Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
  • Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
  • Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
All owner themes in the Grabber AT3 review

Tire B Geolandar A/T G015

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather and rain traction
  • Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
  • Strong performance in light snow and winter conditions (3PMSF rated)

Cons

  • Struggles in deep, sticky mud and wet clay
  • Some reports of faster tread wear or hardening rubber compound over time
  • Softer sidewalls on certain specs can result in a slightly floaty or numb steering feel under heavy loads
All owner themes in the Geolandar A/T G015 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber AT3

Positive

Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.

Top themes
#tread life and durability#gravel and off-road performance#ride comfort and low noise#snow and loose terrain grip#tire damage and sidewall integrity#fitment and tire pressure

Based on 20 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015

Mixed

Most owners praise the Geolandar A/T G015 as a quiet, comfortable all-terrain that works well on highways, in heavy rain and in snow. It also holds up well off-road and in light trails, and it looks good. Complaints include a harsh or stiff ride on some vehicles such as the Outback, road noise, soft sidewalls and a squirrely feel when towing, picking up pebbles in the tread, and a 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss.

ramforum.com ·2016-06-29

“Upped the pressure to 43 PSI for a 1000 mile drive, still suffering about a 1-2mpg penalty but that could also have been due to the higher speeds (west TX speed limit of 80 mph). Got 'em off road on the rocks and they're obviously loads better than the stock SR-As out there. We'll see how they handle mud soon enough. Have 5K miles on these things so far and am satisfied. I'm not super happy per se but I'm satisfied. Jury's still out on whether I'd buy again. Will report back in another few thousand miles.”

r/DubaiPetrolHeads ·7 upvotes ·2026-10-22

“Tires RFID Tags I’ve been looking for a set of Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 tires and contacted several shops while also checking prices online. I was surprised by how much the prices varied between sellers. I then contacted Juma Al Majid, which I think is the official dealer in the UAE. Their price was one of the highest I found. When I mentioned that I had found significantly cheaper options elsewhere, they asked me what prices I have found. After I shared the price range, they seemed surprised and advised me to make sure the tires had RFID tags. After looking into it, I understood that these tags are related to tire identification and compliance with UAE requirements. So, Are tires without RFID tags potentially less suitable for UAE conditions or more prone to damage? Or could they be essentially the same tires, with the price difference simply reflecting different sourcing, importation, or compliance costs? Read more”

r/RangerRaptor ·3 upvotes ·2024-10-19

“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”

Top themes
#Quiet highway manner#Snow and rain traction#Ride comfort mixed#Fuel economy penalty#Light off-road capability#Sizing and fitment#Road noise complaints#Aesthetics and looks

Based on 32 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber AT3 B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available7790
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth—11 - 18/32″
UTQG560 A A360 - 600 A B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common5656

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber AT3

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015

Too close to call: General Grabber AT3 and Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 are within 2 points overall. General Grabber AT3 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is stronger on efficiency, dry and noise.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 57 vs 52 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 76 vs 72 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber AT3 scores 76 vs 73 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Grabber AT3
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber AT3 or Geolandar A/T G015?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT3 or Geolandar A/T G015?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT3 or Geolandar A/T G015?

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber AT3 or Geolandar A/T G015?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Grabber AT3 or Geolandar A/T G015?

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 76 vs 72 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT3 or Geolandar A/T G015?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Grabber AT3 or Geolandar A/T G015?

General Grabber AT3, 76 vs 73 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Grabber AT3 or Geolandar A/T G015?

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 57 vs 52 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology