Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/TX vs BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 373 + 102 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Grabber A/TX 68, Trail-Terrain T/A 69.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 102 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Trail-Terrain T/A +371Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Trail-Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 73 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
Grabber A/TX +865Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Trail-Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 74 63 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73
Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Trail-Terrain T/A +1078Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Trail-Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 67 82 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68
Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 78
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
Trail-Terrain T/A +465Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Trail-Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 64 Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61
Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
Trail-Terrain T/A +367Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Trail-Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 69 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64
Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 67
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Trail-Terrain T/A +272Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Trail-Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70
Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Trail-Terrain T/A +564Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Trail-Terrain T/A Reviews found online 59 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 69 |
| Dry | 68 | 71 |
| Wet | 73 | 65 |
| Snow | 68 | 78 |
| Comfort | 61 | 65 |
| Noise | 64 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
69
/ 100
Trail-Terrain T/A
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
Tire B Trail-Terrain T/A
Pros
- Low road noise for an all-terrain tire, with several reviewers calling it quieter than previous tires such as the AT3 and other all-terrains
- Strong snow and ice performance, including a Colorado snowstorm and multiple Alps trips with up to a foot of snow
- Comfortable, smooth ride and good handling and braking on the road
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction reported by several reviewers, including wheelspin, lack of confidence on wet roads and ABS activation issues
- Some reviewers found road noise high on paved surfaces, and one called it outrageously noisy, though others found it quiet
- Wear is faster for some owners, with one set nearing replacement after about 20,000 miles and two years
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
jeepforum.com
·2021-10-12
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
ram-trx.com
·2025-10-03
“I've got just over 10,000 miles on my General Grabber A/Tx's and I love them. For the terrain I cover, they are great. If you're looking for a mud tire, these aren't going to clean out very well (probably similar to an average A/T like a BFG KO2). But in the deep snow and ice, they've been great. They are also amazingly quiet on the highway, and on loose dirt/gravel they have done really well. I don't have enough miles to tell you how long they will last, but going off how they are wearing right now, I'm optimistic I can get 40,000 miles out of them (I rotate my tires every 4,000 miles).”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 50 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | 660 A A - B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
69
/ 100
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Too close to call: General Grabber A/TX and BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A are within 2 points overall. General Grabber A/TX is stronger on wet. BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A is stronger on snow, comfort and dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 78 vs 68 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber A/TX scores 73 vs 65 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 71 vs 68 on dry.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/TX or Trail-Terrain T/A?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Trail-Terrain T/A?
General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Trail-Terrain T/A?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Trail-Terrain T/A?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 78 vs 68 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or Trail-Terrain T/A?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 67 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Trail-Terrain T/A?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Trail-Terrain T/A?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology