Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 372 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/TX vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 372 + 218 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX is ahead, 69–57
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Grabber A/TX +1256Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 69 50 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
Grabber A/TX +1559Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 75 54 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 74
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 59
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Grabber A/TX +662Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 55 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Grabber A/TX +953Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 59 45 Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 60 – Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +1555Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 72 48 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Grabber A/TX +1147Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro AT2 Reviews found online 58 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 57 |
| Dry | 68 | 56 |
| Wet | 74 | 59 |
| Snow | 68 | 62 |
| Comfort | 62 | 53 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
57
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
Tire B Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
jeepforum.com
·2021-10-12
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
5thgenrams.com
·2019-12-14
“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.
r/nissanfrontier
·32 upvotes ·2025-09-30
“The stock Dynapro AT2 tires are awful in the rain We've had our first real rain since spring today here in the PNW, and I've gotta say these stock Hankook tires are the worst tires I've ever driven in the rain. Every single time I turned around a corner, it's a one tire fire on the inside rear. I've driven in the rain here my whole life, in cars with far more power than these Frontiers, and I've never once had the TC light kick on unintentionally when it's raining out. I'm not even flooring it, I baby the hell out of this truck! I looked it up online and looks like I'm not the only one who's noticed this. I can't imagine the performance in the snow is any good if it can hardly handle some rain. As much as I hate to waste a set of new tires, I just can not wait to upgrade to something better. Noodling around the neighborhood at 20mph spinning up the rears is not something I'd like to keep doing. Read more”
r/4Runner
·24 upvotes ·2019-12-31
“I went with some Hankook Dynapro AT2s after much debate and so far I like them! So much better than the Goodyear’s it came with.”
r/GrandCherokee
·14 upvotes ·2021-03-12
“New tires and carwash! Hankook Dynapro AT2.”
Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability
Based on 47 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 15 | 15 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
57
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber A/TX scores 74 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 56 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber A/TX scores 58 vs 47 on handling.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/TX, 74 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/TX, 62 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology