tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber A/TX vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 370 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Grabber A/TX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire AGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6977

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7575

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 73

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Grabber A/TX +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6862

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6375

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6373

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7275

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6171
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber A/TXHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 69 71
Dry 68 73
Wet 73 74
Snow 69 65
Comfort 66 72
Noise 65 70
Treadwear 69 71
Handling (owners) 61 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber A/TX

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

r/Crosstrek ·12 upvotes ·2025-04-12

“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
jeepforum.com ·2021-10-12

“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber A/TX B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4429
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth14 - 17/32″13/32″
UTQG640 A A - B560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi44 psi
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber A/TX

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the General Grabber A/TX if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 70 vs 65 on noise.

Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

General Grabber A/TX, 69 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology