Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 492 + 119 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber HTS60 is ahead, 74–68
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 77 · 492 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I currently have the Grabber HTS 60s on my Lariat and they ride and handle well. I I liked them so much that when I traded my 23 XLT for my current lariat, I kept the tires. Ditto on the Michelins, they changed the compound on the Defender and now it is a much stiffer riding tire.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Grabber HTS60 | Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 71 |
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 74
Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Grabber HTS60 | Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 74 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 71 |
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 76
Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Grabber HTS60 | Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 70 |
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70
Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Grabber HTS60 | Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 58 |
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 73
Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS60 or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Grabber HTS60 | Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 52 |
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.4 = 73
Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61
No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS60 or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Grabber HTS60 | Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 65 |
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 77.4 = 75
Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Grabber HTS60 | Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 58 |
| Category | General Grabber HTS60 | General Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 68 |
| Dry | 74 | 70 |
| Wet | 76 | 71 |
| Snow | 70 | 70 |
| Comfort | 73 | 64 |
| Noise | 73 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber HTS60
Grabber X3
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.
“Not a Lightning tire, but here is a picture of a defective tire I had on my Focus. Tires had less than a thousand miles on them. I know the pressure was good because I constantly check it, and my TPMS light wasn't on. I found the tread section. It rolled past me as I slowed down on the interstate. There were no punctures or deformities I could find.”
“If you're not going off-road, I'd suggest General Grabber HTS60. I just put 4 on my 2014 XLT SC 5.0 4x4 for $780 out the door from a local independent tire shop in Delaware. Those were on the truck when I got it, and this is the second set I've put on. Quiet, and good in wet and moderate snow. No issues with towing my boat, a 26 ft Leisurecat. Boat is about 6100 fully loaded.”
“Can’t speak for the specific iron man tires you’re looking at, but Carmax put a set of iMpve Gen 2 AS tires on our 300 when we bought it. In dry weather they were fine, wet they weren’t optimal (never hydroplaned, easy to light up the rear wheels) but manageable… god help you if there was snow. They were also worn to 3/32 in 20k miles. Discount Tire has some General Grabber HTS60’s which seem decent, though about $230 more than your most expensive example. If it were my car I’d throw some BFGoodrich Advantage TA Sport LT’s on it, I’m impressed by those.”
Based on 38 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · General Grabber HTS60 | B · General Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 39 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 14/32″ | 18 - 21/32″ |
| UTQG | 620 - 680 A A - B | AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 - 80 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
General Grabber HTS60
General Grabber X3
Winner: General Grabber HTS60 — better handling, noise and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 58 on handling.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 73 vs 61 on noise.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 75 vs 65 on treadwear.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 73 vs 64 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
General Grabber HTS60, 76 vs 71 on our wet score.
General Grabber HTS60, 74 vs 70 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.
General Grabber HTS60, 73 vs 61 on our noise score.
General Grabber HTS60, 73 vs 64 on our comfort score.
General Grabber HTS60, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
