Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber HTS60 vs Michelin Latitude Tour — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 493 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber HTS60 is ahead, 76–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber HTS60
Tire AGeneral

Grabber HTS60

All Season

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 493 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Hey guys, Turns out there's a puncture in one of my general grabbers and the shop is asking that I change all 4 at this point... When came the time to look at new tires, they advised me that these tires are simply Gerneral Grabber HTS60 tires...indicating that they aren't necessarily made different from any regular grabbers they would put on an ice truck. Can anybody confirm this? If so, has anybody tried a different all-season tire like the Michelin Defender LTX by any chance? Wondering if we'd be getting a huge hit in range... Thanks!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Grabber HTS60 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Latitude Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8068

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76

    Latitude Tour: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Grabber HTS60 +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Latitude Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8168

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.2 = 78

    Latitude Tour: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 72

    Snow

    Grabber HTS60 +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Latitude Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7263

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 72

    Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 77

    Comfort

    Grabber HTS60 +14
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Latitude Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8160

    Grabber HTS60: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 80.5 = 77

    Latitude Tour: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Latitude Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online83–

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 83.4 = 73

    No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 77

    Treadwear

    Grabber HTS60 +13
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Latitude Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8363

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 82.9 = 77

    Latitude Tour: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber HTS60 +21
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Latitude Tour
    Reviews found online7857
Scores at a glance
General Grabber HTS60 vs Michelin Latitude Tour: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber HTS60Michelin Latitude Tour
Relative Score 76 66
Dry 76 68
Wet 78 69
Snow 72 66
Comfort 77 63
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 77 64
Handling (owners) 78 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber HTS60

± 8

Latitude Tour

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber HTS60

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium brands
  • Reliable all-season traction in wet, dry, and light winter conditions

Cons

  • Occasional reports of minor road noise or hum at higher speeds
  • Potential manufacturing inconsistencies, such as tires being out-of-round
  • Aggressive tread pattern can occasionally cause slight slippage on loose dirt or debris when taking off
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS60 review

Tire B Latitude Tour

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Very low road noise levels
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Stiff ride characteristics, particularly in colder temperatures
  • Inconsistent tread wear patterns, including premature flaking
  • Limited performance in true winter conditions despite M+S rating
All owner themes in the Latitude Tour review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber HTS60

Positive

Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.

ford-trucks.com

“Just noticed on one of the pics I took of the tire that the factory added about 10lbs of lead to balance it. Seems like they could have done a better job of that... I see the colored dot on the tire and got wondering what that meant. Found this tidbit of info out there: Quote: Where Are the Paint Dots Placed? Quote: The yellow dots identify where a tire weighs the least — the lightest point on a tire. The yellow dot should be lined up and directly next to the valve stem, which is the wheel’s heaviest point. The red dots identify where the tire is flattest — the lowest point on a tire. The red dot should be directly across from the highest point of the wheel, which is usually indicated by a colored dot or a notch on the wheel. If a tire has a yellow and red dot, the red dot takes precedence when balancing the tire. Wonder if the factory people bother to do that correctly?”

rivianforums.com ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-07

“The General Grabber HTS60 is the best value tire currently available for efficiency. While its treadwear is not class-leading, the tire is backed by a mileage warranty, helping offset replacement costs and making its lifetime cost of ownership very attractive. More importantly, numerous Rivian owner reports indicate the HTS60 delivers efficiency that is comparable to, and in some cases exceeds, the OEM 21-inch road tire while significantly outperforming the OEM 20-inch all-terrain tire. When combined with its low purchase price, light weight, quiet ride, and strong on-road manners, the HTS60 stands out as one of the lowest-cost options for achieving near-maximum efficiency.”

r/f150 ·32 upvotes ·2023-07-18

“New shoes today !! General Grabber HTS60 275/55/R20 117T Very good rated and $400 cheaper than the Michelins I wanted. Discount Tire price matched Sams Club since they were 2 weeks out.”

Top themes
#fuel and EV efficiency#budget-friendly pricing#quiet and smooth ride#highway and road performance#light towing capability#winter and wet traction#treadwear and balance issues

Based on 38 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Latitude Tour

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber HTS60 B · Michelin Latitude Tour
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available391
Rim diameters15″ – 22″17″
Tread depth10 - 14/32″—
UTQG620 - 680 A A - B600 - 720 A B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 80 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber HTS60

Michelin Latitude Tour

Winner: General Grabber HTS60 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Latitude Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber HTS60 scores 78 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber HTS60 scores 78 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · General Grabber HTS60
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Tour

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber HTS60 or Latitude Tour?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber HTS60 or Latitude Tour?

General Grabber HTS60, 78 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber HTS60 or Latitude Tour?

General Grabber HTS60, 76 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber HTS60 or Latitude Tour?

General Grabber HTS60, 72 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber HTS60 or Latitude Tour?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber HTS60 or Latitude Tour?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology