Tests – · none yet Owners – · none yet
Goodyear Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 0 + 1,263 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 18 tests Owners 70 · 1,263 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)
“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison68Why this score
Source Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests – 67 Reviews found online – 68 EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 68 = 68
-
–
Wet
No comparison78Why this score
Source Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests – 81 Reviews found online – 73 EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 73.2 = 78
-
–
Snow
No comparison66Why this score
Source Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 64 Reviews found online – 70 EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64 + 40% × 69.7 = 66
-
–
Comfort
No comparison71Why this score
Source Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 73 Reviews found online – 67 EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 67 = 71
-
–
Noise
No comparison46Why this score
Source Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 31 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 31.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 46
No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison74Why this score
Source Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season EUROALL SEASON AS210 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 71 EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 71.2 = 74
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison68Why this score
Source Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season EUROALL SEASON AS210 Reviews found online – 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season | Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 70 |
| Dry | – | 68 |
| Wet | – | 78 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | – | 71 |
| Noise | – | 46 |
| Treadwear | – | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season
EUROALL SEASON AS210
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B EUROALL SEASON AS210
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
- High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
- Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain
Cons
- Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
- Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Goodyear Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
Based on 10 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season | B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 92 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Only Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology