Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 30 reviews
Michelin Cross Terrain looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 vs Michelin Cross Terrain — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 30 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Cross Terrain is ahead, 72–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 3 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Cross Terrain +470Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Cross Terrain Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 66 71 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
No road tests of dry for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Cross Terrain +674Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Cross Terrain Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 67 75 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68
Cross Terrain: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74
No road tests of wet for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Comfort
Cross Terrain +570Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Cross Terrain Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 62 70 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Assurance Triplemax 2 or Cross Terrain. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Cross Terrain +873Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Cross Terrain Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 78 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 65
Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Cross Terrain +871Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Cross Terrain Reviews found online 63 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | Michelin Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 72 |
| Dry | 66 | 70 |
| Wet | 68 | 74 |
| Comfort | 65 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Assurance Triplemax 2
Cross Terrain
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance Triplemax 2
Pros
- Superb dry and wet grip when new
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and handling during heavy rain
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Becomes significantly noisier as the tread wears down
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or crashy ride over rough surfaces
- Decline in wet grip and performance as the tire ages or wears past 50%
Tire B Cross Terrain
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage
- Superior quietness and ride comfort
- Reliable grip and performance in winter conditions
Cons
- Limited performance capabilities for high-speed or aggressive driving
- Discontinued product availability
- Performance bias favors winter conditions over dry or wet handling
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | B · Michelin Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2
Michelin Cross Terrain
Winner: Michelin Cross Terrain — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Cross Terrain rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 71 vs 63 on handling.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 74 vs 68 on wet.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Assurance Triplemax 2 or Cross Terrain?
Which is better in the wet, Assurance Triplemax 2 or Cross Terrain?
Michelin Cross Terrain, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance Triplemax 2 or Cross Terrain?
Michelin Cross Terrain, 70 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Assurance Triplemax 2 or Cross Terrain?
Michelin Cross Terrain, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Assurance Triplemax 2 or Cross Terrain?
Michelin Cross Terrain, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology