Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 30 reviews
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 30 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
NanoEnergy R38 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
NanoEnergy R38 +571Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 NanoEnergy R38 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 66 72 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
No road tests of dry for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
NanoEnergy R38 +472Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 NanoEnergy R38 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 67 73 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68
NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Comfort
NanoEnergy R38 +469Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 NanoEnergy R38 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 62 69 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Assurance Triplemax 2 or NanoEnergy R38. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 NanoEnergy R38 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 65 Assurance Triplemax 2: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 65
NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance Triplemax 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
63
Handling (owners)
NanoEnergy R38 +871Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 NanoEnergy R38 Reviews found online 63 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | Toyo NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 70 |
| Dry | 66 | 71 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Comfort | 65 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Assurance Triplemax 2
NanoEnergy R38
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance Triplemax 2
Pros
- Superb dry and wet grip when new
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and handling during heavy rain
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Becomes significantly noisier as the tread wears down
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or crashy ride over rough surfaces
- Decline in wet grip and performance as the tire ages or wears past 50%
Tire B NanoEnergy R38
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry grip with predictable handling limits
- Good value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
- Solid longevity and mileage, with respectable tread wear reported
Cons
- Slightly increased road noise reported by some users
- Limited size or availability challenges noted by consumers wanting replacements
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2
Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Narrow edge: Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy R38 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 63 on handling.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 66 on dry.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Assurance Triplemax 2 or NanoEnergy R38?
Which is better in the wet, Assurance Triplemax 2 or NanoEnergy R38?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance Triplemax 2 or NanoEnergy R38?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Assurance Triplemax 2 or NanoEnergy R38?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Assurance Triplemax 2 or NanoEnergy R38?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology