Tests 76 · 2 tests Owners 67 · 2,838 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE050A RFT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is ahead, 73–44
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 32 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +2849Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Potenza RE050A RFT Professional tests (TWG score) 77 – Reviews found online 77 39 -
77
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +3344Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Potenza RE050A RFT Professional tests (TWG score) 78 – Reviews found online 75 36 -
50
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Potenza RE050A RFT Reviews found online 36 – -
74
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +3044Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Potenza RE050A RFT Professional tests (TWG score) 76 – Reviews found online 71 19 -
68
Noise
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +1652Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Potenza RE050A RFT Professional tests (TWG score) 68 – Reviews found online 69 30 -
64
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +2242Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Potenza RE050A RFT Reviews found online 63 24 -
74
Handling
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +4232Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Potenza RE050A RFT Reviews found online 74 32
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 44 |
| Dry | 77 | 49 |
| Wet | 77 | 44 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 44 |
| Noise | 68 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 42 |
| Handling | 74 | 32 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Potenza RE050A RFT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry traction and braking performance
- Superior ride comfort and significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors or run-flats
- Predictable and progressive handling limits
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on high-powered or rear-wheel-drive vehicles
- Softer sidewalls can induce a 'spongy' or 'jelly-like' feel during sharp, high-speed direction changes
- Susceptible to sidewall bulging or cracking when encountering harsh potholes, especially in run-flat variants
Tire B Potenza RE050A RFT
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Max Performance Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | — |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A RFT
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 74 vs 32 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 77 vs 44 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 74 vs 44 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 77 vs 49 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.