Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 20 road tests and 5,821 + 1,277 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is ahead, 71–56
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 12 tests Owners 69 · 5,821 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry braking)
“I've got just that on my coupe and love the tyres! massive difference from my fk453s that I have on my csl reps. took 300ish miles to properly bead in but now they're brilliant!”
Tests 58 · 20 tests Owners 53 · 1,277 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Had the older version on an SRT8. Grip & performance were great. But wear was not. 10K miles(2 rotations) is all I got.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 18 tests | 75 | 61 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 64 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 6–0 | 97% | 91% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 4–1 | 98% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 86% | 75% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 71.7 = 74
Proxes Sport: 60% × 60.6 + 40% × 63.6 = 62
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 18 tests | 80 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 59 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 98% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0 | 90% | 79% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 3–3 | 92% | 93% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 6–0 | 98% | 96% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 76.5 = 79
Proxes Sport: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 59 = 69
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 51 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 51 | 10 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 59
Proxes Sport: 60% × 51.3 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 35
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Proxes Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 49 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 59 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 73.1 = 72
Proxes Sport: 40% × 49.4 + 60% × 58.7 = 55
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 11 tests | 64 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 68 |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 98% | 99% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 76.5 = 69
Proxes Sport: 60% × 72 + 40% × 68.2 = 70
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests | 70 | 37 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 54 |
| Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 72% | 62% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 66 = 68
Proxes Sport: 60% × 37.1 + 40% × 54.3 = 44
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | 55 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 12 tests | 75 | 41 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 100% | 92% |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 56 |
| Dry | 74 | 62 |
| Wet | 79 | 69 |
| Snow | 59 | 35 |
| Comfort | 72 | 55 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 44 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 55 |
| Efficiency | 75 | 41 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Proxes Sport
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 7 tests that ran both, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 finished ahead 7 times and Toyo Proxes Sport 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes Sport | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% | 91% | +5.6 | 6–0 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 98% | 0.0 | 4–1 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 86% | 75% | +10.6 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% | 98% | −0.4 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% | 93% | −0.9 | 3–3 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 96% | +2.5 | 6–0 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 90% | 79% | +11.3 | 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 99% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 72% | 62% | +10.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% | 92% | +7.7 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 82% | 100% | −17.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/11 | #10/11 | – | 7–0 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members frequently consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as an affordable alternative when replacing factory run-flats, praising its handling, low road noise, and strong grip compared to earlier tires. However, sentiment is tempered by criticism of its poor snow capability as a summer tire, complaints about the RunOnFlat variant from performance car owners, and mixed tread wear reports compared to rivals like Michelin.
“Most recent 3 tyres for me: Current at >40,000km - Bridgestone Potenza RE003 ~20,000km - Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ~35,000km - Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 The Pilot Sport 4 has been my favourite of the three by far - handling felt just as good as the Goodyear Eagle F1 whilst having less road noise and incredible wet grip, but they just didn't last long. But I enjoyed them so much I'll try the Pilot Sport 5's next as they supposedly have improvements to tread wear.”
“I've got just that on my coupe and love the tyres! massive difference from my fk453s that I have on my csl reps. took 300ish miles to properly bead in but now they're brilliant!”
“I've run Conti 5P's on my E63's and they grip well in both wet and dry, last reasonably (circa 13k miles on the rear, a little further on the front, and I change my tyres when they're down to 2.5mm - 3mm of tread), but are a bit noisy. My wife's SLK55 is on 5P's too and the fronts last about 20k, the rears 12k - 13k. Are you running MO-spec tyres or the generic version? This can have a significant effect on life expectancy. FWIW, I'm now running Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3's on my E63. They grip as well as, if not better than, the 5P's and are noticeably quieter. I've got 11.5k miles on the current set and they still have a good 5mm of tread remaining, so I anticipate that they will run to at least 14k miles.”
Based on 32 community posts
Community sentiment toward the Toyo Proxes Sport family is generally positive, with users praising its value for money, comfortable ride quality, and capable daily street performance. While drivers note it lacks the sharp turn-in and grip of dedicated 200tw track tires, it is frequently highlighted as a cost-effective alternative to Michelin and Continental. Many prospective buyers note a relative scarcity of reviews, but those who run them report good traction, low noise, and appealing wide fitment options.
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money. Read more”
“I finally got Toyo Proxes Sport tires to replace my old Michelins. I up sized with 295/30-19's front and 345/25-20's rear on the stock wheels. I really like the fitment and don't have any rubbing even being lowered on the stock jacking bolts. I'm amazed how well they hook although I don't have a good reference as the 9-year-old Michelins were like rocks LOL. The ride is a bit better as well on non-run-flats.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Brian Goodwin I own both the Falken and Toyo Proxes Sport, both in 235/40-17. The Toyo rides better, the Falken goes faster through the turns, and turn-in response is much quicker. I have not bothered to take the Toyo to the track because around our fun canyon roads it is clearly slower and with less grip than the Falken. The Falken feels like a race tire, complete with stiff sidewall support for crisp turn-in, used those for track and autocross over the last few months, including two wins in class at autocross. The Toyo feels like a street tire, much like the Continental ECS, complete with much lower weight because sidewalls are comparatively soft and squishy next to the Falken. If you want a soft daily driver 235/40 and you accept it is a few clicks slower than the Falken, the Toyo is great as a daily driver. But if you expect that Toyo to keep up with the Falken on track days, you will be disappointed. Great feedback, thanks Brian. Wish there were more options in this size! May just stick with the RT660s, especially now with the HKS GT2 on the car”
Based on 32 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | B · Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | 83 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 11/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 42 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 26 | 26 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Toyo Proxes Sport
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better efficiency, snow and treadwear. Where the Toyo Proxes Sport is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 75 vs 41 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 59 vs 35 on snow.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 68 vs 44 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 74 vs 55 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 79 vs 69 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 59 vs 35 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 72 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 68 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 75 vs 41 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
