Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 12 + 0 road tests and 5,817 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and Proxes ST are level at 71.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 12 tests Owners 68 · 5,817 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry braking)
“I've got just that on my coupe and love the tyres! massive difference from my fk453s that I have on my csl reps. took 300ish miles to properly bead in but now they're brilliant!”
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests | 75 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 75 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 70.9 = 73
Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests | 80 | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 77 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 79.6 + 40% × 74.7 = 78
Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 50 | 64 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 58
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 74 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 64 | – |
| Reviews found online | 75 | – |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 68
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 72 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 65.6 = 68
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 71 |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 73 | 72 |
| Wet | 78 | 75 |
| Snow | 58 | 66 |
| Comfort | 71 | 72 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Proxes ST
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members frequently consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as an affordable alternative when replacing factory run-flats, praising its handling, low road noise, and strong grip compared to earlier tires. However, sentiment is tempered by criticism of its poor snow capability as a summer tire, complaints about the RunOnFlat variant from performance car owners, and mixed tread wear reports compared to rivals like Michelin.
“Hi I am having a set of these fitted tomorrow. They are the same sizes as yours. The total cost will be £366 including fitting and balancing. I am using a Formula One Autocentre. I don't know if there is one in your area but it would be worth having a look. Hope this helps.”
“Originally Posted By: slacktide_bitog DTD has their memorial day sale, and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is $132 each, plus $200 in rebates. If you open up a DTD credit card, there is another $100 $50 rebate available (making the total $300 $250 off) I made a slight mistake, sorry But still, $200 or $250 off the set of four tires is a great deal”
“I've run Conti 5P's on my E63's and they grip well in both wet and dry, last reasonably (circa 13k miles on the rear, a little further on the front, and I change my tyres when they're down to 2.5mm - 3mm of tread), but are a bit noisy. My wife's SLK55 is on 5P's too and the fronts last about 20k, the rears 12k - 13k. Are you running MO-spec tyres or the generic version? This can have a significant effect on life expectancy. FWIW, I'm now running Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3's on my E63. They grip as well as, if not better than, the 5P's and are noticeably quieter. I've got 11.5k miles on the current set and they still have a good 5mm of tread remaining, so I anticipate that they will run to at least 14k miles.”
Based on 32 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | B · Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 39 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 19″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 42 - 51 psi | — |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Toyo Proxes ST
Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and Toyo Proxes ST are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is stronger on wet. Toyo Proxes ST is stronger on snow. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 66 vs 58 on snow.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 78 vs 75 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 78 vs 75 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 58 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
