Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Vredestein Ultrac Satin — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 8 road tests and 1,929 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Ultrac Satin. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Vredestein Ultrac Satin: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Relative Score
89
76
Dry
94
67
Wet
92
80
Comfort
79
87
Noise
82
77
Treadwear
86
74
Handling (owners)
90
85
Efficiency
71
71
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
± 4
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
76
/ 100
± 7
Ultrac Satin
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
Discipline
Category
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Ultrac Satin
Δ
Head-to-head
Dry Braking
Dry
95%#13/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
92%#20/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
100%#1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
98%#14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark)
Dry
80%#11/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
57%#14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning
Wet
98%#5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
100%#1/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Braking
Wet
92%#7/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
93%#8/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Circle
Wet
97%#3/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
98%#2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
97%#4/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
95%#7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark)
Wet
92%#9/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test
58%#7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark)
Comfort
60%#5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
100%#3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Noise
Noise
100%#2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
100%#2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Noise (tester's mark)
Noise
60%#5/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test
100%#1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wear
Treadwear
99%#2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
71%#8/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
84%#9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
79%#9/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price
Cost
65%#9/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test
62%#11/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Grass Traction
Off-road
77%#3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
94%#2/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Gravel Handling
Off-road
100%#2/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
100%#2/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Gravel Traction
Off-road
93%#4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
91%#10/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Mud Traction
Off-road
91%#6/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test
92%#4/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Sand Traction
Off-road
96%#2/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test
94%#6/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
#8/502026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
#6/82021 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test R18
–
Different tests
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Pros
Outstanding grip and confidence in both wet and dry weather conditions
Noticeably lower road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
Sharp, responsive steering feel and progressive handling at the limit
Cons
Rapid tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly squishy feel or floatiness during aggressive quick transitions
Some susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water at high speeds
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Positive
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.
#Strong dry grip#Michelin PS5 comparison#Comfort and ride harshness#Wear and durability#Cold-weather performance concerns#Value and pricing#BMW star OEM version#EV-ready and fitment questions
Based on 29 community posts
Tire B
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
B · Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Category
Summer
Summer
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
130
52
Rim diameters
17″ – 23″
16″ – 20″
Tread depth
7 - 9/32″
—
UTQG
260 - 300 AA A
—
Treadwear warranty
30,000 mi
—
Sidewall
Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
—
Max pressure
50 - 51 psi
—
Sizes in common
35
35
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
76
/ 100
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac Satin if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire AYou want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 94 vs 67 on dry.
Pick tire AYour priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 92 vs 80 on wet.
Pick tire AYou want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 86 vs 74 on treadwear.
Pick tire BYou want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 87 vs 79 on comfort.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology