Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 4 road tests and 1,946 + 2,201 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 89–69
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 93 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,946 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,201 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 3 tests | 96 | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 68 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 91.5 = 94
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / 3 tests | 93 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 64 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 93 + 40% × 91.6 = 92
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 52 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 12 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.2 = 36
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 1 tests | 76 | 62 |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 61 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 81.3 = 79
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 1 tests | 92 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 60 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 91.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 82
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 59.5 = 68
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 3 tests | 96 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 59 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 69.8 = 86
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 90 | 71 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 1 tests | 71 | 71 |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 69 |
| Dry | 94 | 74 |
| Wet | 92 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 79 | 62 |
| Noise | 82 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 90 | 71 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #13/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% #7/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #4/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 60% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 99% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 84% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 65% #9/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #6/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | #14/20 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 83% #4/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 57% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.
“you could fit them but they are not NF rated, only 5 is NF0 and NF1 rated but on the 21" sized for the sedan.”
“im on my 4th set of goodyear eagle f1 asymmetric 6 and i will never go back to other brands or models. i use them on my e220d estate and as a job im uber driver and do about 7000 miles a month.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Toothadash Hi guys thanks for your input and sharing what you are using. I have gone for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with 20% off so worked out around £150 each fitted. You'll not go wrong with those; superb tyres and loved them on our F31 when I ran 2 sets of wheels”
Based on 29 community posts
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
Based on 22 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 130 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 260 - 300 AA A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 36 | 36 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 92 vs 67 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 94 vs 74 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 71 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 79 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 92 vs 67 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 94 vs 74 on our dry score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 82 vs 68 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
