Tests 73 · 14 tests Owners 77 · 259 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test (wet handling)
Head-to-head
Updated
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 31 road tests and 259 + 907 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 SuperSport leads, 76–73 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, Eagle F1 SuperSport won 1 and Azenis FK510 won 2 (average 96% vs 94% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured dry handling for both, Eagle F1 SuperSport won 3 and Azenis FK510 won 0 (average 98% vs 95% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Eagle F1 SuperSport won 1 and Azenis FK510 won 2 (average 97% vs 98% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, Eagle F1 SuperSport won 1 and Azenis FK510 won 2 (average 89% vs 92% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured wet handling for both, Eagle F1 SuperSport won 2 and Azenis FK510 won 0 (average 98% vs 96% of the best).
-
87
Dry
Eagle F1 SuperSport +1374Why this score
Source Eagle F1 SuperSport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 28 tests 87 73 Reviews found online 88 75 Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 96% 94% Dry Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 98% 95% Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 87.5 = 87
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 74
-
82
Wet
Azenis FK510 +385Why this score
Source Eagle F1 SuperSport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 29 tests 83 89 Reviews found online 80 78 Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 96% 91% Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 97% 98% Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 89% 92% Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 97% 96% Wet Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–0 98% 96% Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 80.1 = 82
Azenis FK510: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.2 = 85
-
–
Snow
No comparison55Why this score
Source Eagle F1 SuperSport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online – 46 Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
52
Comfort
Azenis FK510 +557Why this score
Source Eagle F1 SuperSport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 6 tests 28 42 Reviews found online 68 68 Eagle F1 SuperSport: 40% × 28.2 + 60% × 68 = 52
Azenis FK510: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 67.6 = 57
-
50
Noise
Azenis FK510 +1666Why this score
Source Eagle F1 SuperSport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 18 tests 33 66 Reviews found online 75 67 Noise (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 98% 99% Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 32.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 50
Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.2 = 66
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source Eagle F1 SuperSport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 64 54 Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.1 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 SuperSport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
86
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 SuperSport +1472Why this score
Source Eagle F1 SuperSport Azenis FK510 Reviews found online 86 72 -
24
Efficiency
Azenis FK510 +2751Why this score
Source Eagle F1 SuperSport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 19 tests 24 51 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–1 86% 87%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 73 |
| Dry | 87 | 74 |
| Wet | 82 | 85 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | 52 | 57 |
| Noise | 50 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 24 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Eagle F1 SuperSport
73
/ 100
Azenis FK510
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport finished ahead 4 times and Falken Azenis FK510 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% | 94% | +1.8 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 95% | +2.5 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | 88% #7/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% | 91% | +5.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% | 98% | −0.5 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 89% | 92% | −3.1 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% | 96% | +1.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 96% | +1.7 | 2–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 80% #4/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | 88% #5/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 84% #7/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test | 70% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Exterior Noise | Noise | 99% #3/7 · 2025 Autobild Sportcars Summer Tire Test R20 | 70% #8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 99% | −1.3 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% | 87% | −1.1 | 1–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 55% | 79% | −23.9 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 93% #3/9 · 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 87% #6/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/10 | #10/10 | – | 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test · 235/35 R19 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 SuperSport
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and high-speed stability
- Precise steering response and high-feedback handling
- Strong track-day performance and heat tolerance
Cons
- Rapid tread wear on high-torque vehicles or track use
- Increased road noise and harsher ride quality
- Reduced grip and confidence in cold or damp conditions
Tire B Azenis FK510
Pros
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Falken Azenis FK510
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
r/TeslaModelS
·1 upvote ·2025-11-28
“2022 MS Plaid on 21" archnids. Factory Michelins replaced at 7,500 miles (at wear markers). FK510's after 9,000 miles on the rubber are at 7/32. Expecting another 5,000 miles or so. They're comparable treadwear rating but last longer. Heavy car with lots of torque will inevitably go through tires sooner than the rated mileage. I'm fortunate to have decent alignment from the factory as the wear was even. Good luck on the next set of tires.”
corvetteforum.com
“I purchased a full set of Falken Azenis FK510 tires in January of last year. Ride, quietness, and wet/dry handling were all right on the money with the Tire Rack and other reviews that I looked over when deciding which tires to buy. Now I'm wishing I'd gone ahead and spent the extra money to get another set of Michelins. The rear tires are completely worn down now after only daily driving the car and putting maybe 15k miles on the tires. The same driving conditions with the previous Michelin PSIII tires resulted in the tires lasting for 5 years and 50k miles. Tread wear is the only complaint I have with these tires, but it is one massive issue with tires only lasting 15k miles with tame daily driving. My advice is to spend the extra money and get the Michelin tires. That's what I'll be doing this weekend.”
r/Mustang
·1 upvote ·2025-12-28
“Accidentally bought a Falken FK510 at discount tire when my other rear tire is a FK460A/S I have a brand new 460A/S on my driver rear a week ago and I went to discount yesterday and accidentally bought the 510 for my passenger rear. My biggest concerns is the difference in grip and wear and for the torsen limited slip on my GT PP1. I just daily my car to work and floor it at lights and don’t do canyon or track runs. I saw discount tire has a return / exchange policy, has anyone gone this route?”
Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving
Based on 63 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 75 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 23″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 080 - 300 A - AA A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 50 | 50 |
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
73
/ 100
Falken Azenis FK510
Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport — better handling and dry. Pick the Falken Azenis FK510 if efficiency, noise and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 51 vs 24 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 50 on noise.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 86 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 87 vs 74 on dry.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 SuperSport or Azenis FK510?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 85 vs 82 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Azenis FK510?
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, 87 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 50 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 57 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Azenis FK510?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Which rolls more easily, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 51 vs 24 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology