tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Kumho Ecsta KU39 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 261 + 125 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 SuperSport is ahead, 78–71

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 SuperSport or Ecsta KU39 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Tire AGoodyear

Eagle F1 SuperSport

Summer

± 5

Tests 72 · 14 tests Owners 77 · 261 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test (wet handling)

Kumho Ecsta KU39
Tire BKumho

Ecsta KU39

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 125 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    Eagle F1 SuperSport +15
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SuperSportEcsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests87≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8774

    Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 87 = 87

    Ecsta KU39: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta KU39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Eagle F1 SuperSport +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SuperSportEcsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests82≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8074

    Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 79.9 = 81

    Ecsta KU39: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta KU39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 51

    Comfort

    Ecsta KU39 +19
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SuperSportEcsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests26≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6871

    Eagle F1 SuperSport: 40% × 26.4 + 60% × 67.5 = 51

    Ecsta KU39: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.8 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KU39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 50

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SuperSportEcsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests33–
    Reviews found online75–

    Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 32.8 + 40% × 75.3 = 50

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SuperSportEcsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65

    Ecsta KU39: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 SuperSport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KU39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 85

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 SuperSport +14
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SuperSportEcsta KU39
    Reviews found online8571
  7. 23

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SuperSportEcsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests23–
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 SuperSportKumho Ecsta KU39
Relative Score 78 71
Dry 87 72
Wet 81 73
Comfort 51 70
Noise 50 –
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 85 71
Efficiency 23 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Eagle F1 SuperSport

± 8

Ecsta KU39

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 SuperSportEcsta KU39ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test #13/49 2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tyre Shootout – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 SuperSport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and high-speed stability
  • Precise steering response and high-feedback handling
  • Strong track-day performance and heat tolerance

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear on high-torque vehicles or track use
  • Increased road noise and harsher ride quality
  • Reduced grip and confidence in cold or damp conditions
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 SuperSport review

Tire B Ecsta KU39

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong wet and dry traction
  • Outstanding ride comfort and low road noise

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of steering sharpness or 'squirm' under heavy load
  • Performance can drop off noticeably as tread depth approaches 3mm
All owner themes in the Ecsta KU39 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport B · Kumho Ecsta KU39
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available754
Rim diameters18″ – 23″17″ – 19″
Tread depth7 - 10/32″—
UTQG080 - 300 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

Kumho Ecsta KU39

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Kumho Ecsta KU39 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta KU39 scores 70 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 87 vs 72 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 85 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 81 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KU39
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 SuperSport or Ecsta KU39?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Ecsta KU39?

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, 81 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Ecsta KU39?

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, 87 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Ecsta KU39?

Kumho Ecsta KU39, 70 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 SuperSport or Ecsta KU39?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology