Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 242 + 186 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–56
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 31 · 1 test Owners 68 · 242 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 7 in Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] (noise)
“What tires are a good alternative to Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure With Kevlar? I need to be replace mine after 35k.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 30 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 77 |
Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure: 60% × 29.6 + 40% × 69.6 = 46
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 28 | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 75 |
Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure: 60% × 28.3 + 40% × 71.7 = 46
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 62 |
Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 75 |
Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 67
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 48 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 73 |
Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure: 60% × 47.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 56
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 75 |
Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 66
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | 71 |
| Category | Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 71 |
| Dry | 46 | 73 |
| Wet | 46 | 74 |
| Snow | 67 | 65 |
| Comfort | 67 | 72 |
| Noise | 56 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure finished ahead 1 times and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/7 | #4/7 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test · 265/65 R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure with Kevlar is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its smooth and quiet highway ride, capable mild-to-moderate off-road traction, and solid tread life. Many appreciate its durability and value over competitors, though several users note minor drawbacks such as decreased fuel economy and mixed feedback regarding wet and winter braking performance, particularly between LT and P-metric versions.
“I run that tire on my F150, different size and in Load Range C. Its funny reading the reviews on them as they sell the tire in LT sizes and in P-series sizes, and the bad reviews are usually on the P-series sizes (shallower tread, and not 3PMSF rated either). For me, they've been a good tire. They can be a bit squirrley in rain, and I run dedicated winter tires so I'm not concerned about winter performance. Overall, they've been quiet, great dry weather, and capable enough off road and on gravel. The pair that didn't get a non-repairable screw in them from the factory made it out to 80k miles of use Still had 4/32 tread at that point...”
“Just put a set on my 2012 platinum and they are great. I replaced the stock pirellis which were still in good shape but were terrible in the snow. I've only had the tires on for about a week so I don't have a long term review although we have gotten a lot of snow where I am the past week and I can say they work great in snow also on wet roads and remain quiet on dry roads. I have no off road review tho. Very happy with the purchase”
“I have pictures in my gallery, they are lame. They look nice, nothing fancy, ok for me as I kept the stock size. My gas mileage dropped, they are heavier than my previous tires (wrangler ATS) and have a deeper, more aggressive tread. I spoke with goodyear tech support before purchasing and they told me to expect a 5-10% increase in fuel consumption right away which is holding true. It will improve with time. As for performance, after several long haul trips up north into Northern Ontario, smooth and quiet on the highway, and really handling the trails nicely. I've gone done some pretty knarly trails(I'm talking deep forest unmaintained trails with no cell phone service) the last few weeks and have little fear of punctures from the sharp rocks and stuff or getting stuck. I do recommend road force balance, highway ride went from OK to smooth as glass after that. I drove for a couple of weeks before the balance issues really got on my nerves and had to try something.”
Based on 40 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure | B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 14 | 29 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 10 | 10 |
Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better wet, dry and noise. Where the Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 46 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 46 on dry.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 70 vs 56 on noise.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 46 on our wet score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 46 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 56 on our noise score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
