tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 67 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads, 74–71 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP2 RA33 or DynaPro A/TM RF10 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7779

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 75

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online7580

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6267

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 68

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7579

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7374

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7576

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2 RA33
    Reviews found online7177
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Relative Score 71 74
Dry 73 75
Wet 74 77
Snow 65 68
Comfort 72 74
Noise 70 70
Treadwear 71 72
Handling (owners) 71 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Dynapro HP2 RA33

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2 RA33ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #11/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2949
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi65,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 68 vs 65 on snow.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 68 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology