tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Hankook Dynapro M/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 72–66

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro M/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire BHankook

Dynapro M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7764

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7567

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Dynapro M/T +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6269

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7554

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro M/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro M/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7567

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro M/T
    Reviews found online7161
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Hankook Dynapro M/T
Relative Score 72 66
Dry 73 65
Wet 74 68
Snow 65 69
Comfort 72 61
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 71 66
Handling (owners) 71 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Dynapro M/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro M/TΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #5/10 2016 All Terrain and Off Road MT Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Dynapro M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD

Cons

  • Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
  • Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
  • Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
All owner themes in the Dynapro M/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
CategoryAll-Terrain tireMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available29—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Hankook Dynapro M/T

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Hankook Dynapro M/T if snow matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro M/T?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 69 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro M/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology