tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 186 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: DynaPro A/TM RF10 71, Crugen HT51 72.

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Level
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7777

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7577

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6270

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7572

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7378

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)58
    Reviews found online7574

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HT51
    Reviews found online7175
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Kumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 71 72
Dry 73 73
Wet 74 75
Snow 65 70
Comfort 72 71
Noise 70 72
Treadwear 71 64
Handling (owners) 71 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Crugen HT51

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Crugen HT51ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #5/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2944
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth13/32″12.5/32″
UTQG560 A B720 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi50 psi
Sizes in common1919

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Kumho Crugen HT51

Too close to call: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Kumho Crugen HT51 are within 2 points overall. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on treadwear. Kumho Crugen HT51 is stronger on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 65 on snow.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Crugen HT51?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology