Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Michelin Latitude Tour HP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 33 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 72–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 33 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1360Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Latitude Tour HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 77 55 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 60
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1460Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Latitude Tour HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 75 57 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 60
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +461Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Latitude Tour HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 55 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 61
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +864Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Latitude Tour HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 59 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 64
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Latitude Tour HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Latitude Tour HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1259Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Latitude Tour HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 75 55 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1853Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Latitude Tour HP Reviews found online 71 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Michelin Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 60 |
| Dry | 73 | 60 |
| Wet | 74 | 60 |
| Snow | 65 | 61 |
| Comfort | 72 | 64 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | 59 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Latitude Tour HP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Latitude Tour HP | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | #14/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Latitude Tour HP
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
- High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications
Cons
- Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
- Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
- Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | 7 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 53 on handling.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 60 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 60 on dry.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 59 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Latitude Tour HP?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Latitude Tour HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Latitude Tour HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Latitude Tour HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Latitude Tour HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Latitude Tour HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology