Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 186 reviews
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Pirelli Scorpion ATR — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 33 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 33 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +173Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion ATR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 77 75 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
Scorpion ATR: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +767Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion ATR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 76 65 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74
Scorpion ATR: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Snow
Scorpion ATR +165Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion ATR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 59 61 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 64
Scorpion ATR: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
73
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +469Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion ATR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 74 69 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
Scorpion ATR: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +168Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion ATR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 73 71 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69
Scorpion ATR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion ATR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +766Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion ATR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 78 66 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 73
Scorpion ATR: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
Scorpion ATR +171Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion ATR Reviews found online 70 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Pirelli Scorpion ATR |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 69 |
| Dry | 74 | 73 |
| Wet | 74 | 67 |
| Snow | 64 | 65 |
| Comfort | 73 | 69 |
| Noise | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Scorpion ATR
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 finished ahead 1 times and Pirelli Scorpion ATR 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Scorpion ATR | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #14/13 | #15/13 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Scorpion ATR
Pros
- Exceptionally smooth and quiet ride on the highway for an all-terrain tire
- Confident dry and wet traction with reliable handling in rain and mud
- Sturdy construction offering good puncture resistance on rough terrain
Cons
- Poor performance in deep, hard-packed snow and ice
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing rapid wear or steel belts showing prematurely
- Wet traction and hydroplaning resistance decline noticeably as the tread wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Pirelli Scorpion ATR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | 18 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 14″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A B | 440 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 10 | 10 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pirelli Scorpion ATR
Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Where the Pirelli Scorpion ATR is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 67 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 66 on treadwear.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion ATR?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion ATR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion ATR?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion ATR?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion ATR?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion ATR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion ATR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology