Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 186 + 1,627 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 leads, 73–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 1,627 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Geolandar A/T G015 +275Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 77 76 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 76.3 = 75
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +272Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 75 78 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 77.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
Geolandar A/T G015 +974Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 62 71 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 71.3 = 74
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
Geolandar A/T G015 +173Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 76 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
Geolandar A/T G015 +676Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 73 77 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 76.5 = 76
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +170Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 73 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Geolandar A/T G015 +374Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Geolandar A/T G015 Reviews found online 71 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 73 |
| Dry | 73 | 75 |
| Wet | 74 | 72 |
| Snow | 65 | 74 |
| Comfort | 72 | 73 |
| Noise | 70 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Geolandar A/T G015
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Geolandar A/T G015 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #14/13 | #16/13 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Geolandar A/T G015
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather and rain traction
- Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and winter conditions (3PMSF rated)
Cons
- Struggles in deep, sticky mud and wet clay
- Some reports of faster tread wear or hardening rubber compound over time
- Softer sidewalls on certain specs can result in a slightly floaty or numb steering feel under heavy loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
“I may up the pressure to your suggestion - I'm running the door jamb recommended 39 PSI all around. I pick up little pebbles in the tread all day, every day, I notice. I have noticed a ~2 mpg loss on fuel economy, which really adds a lot to the "price" of the tires. Are you seeing any worse MPGs?”
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”
Based on 30 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | 90 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A B | 360 - 600 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 28 | 28 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Narrow edge: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better snow and noise. Where the Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 65 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 76 vs 70 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 74 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 76 vs 70 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar A/T G015?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology