Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Michelin CrossClimate SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 7 + 23 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate SUV is ahead, 77–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 4 tests Owners 72 · 23 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2022 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
CrossClimate SUV +2082Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 59 74 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
CrossClimate SUV: 60% × 86.9 + 40% × 74.3 = 82
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
CrossClimate SUV +1482Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 67 78 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
CrossClimate SUV: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 78.3 = 82
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison70Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 69 Reviews found online – 72 CrossClimate SUV: 60% × 69.1 + 40% × 71.9 = 70
-
65
Comfort
CrossClimate SUV +570Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 61 71 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
CrossClimate SUV: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or CrossClimate SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison74Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 76 Reviews found online – 72 CrossClimate SUV: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 71.5 = 74
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 65 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
CrossClimate SUV: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate SUV +1471Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CrossClimate SUV Reviews found online 57 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Michelin CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 77 |
| Dry | 62 | 82 |
| Wet | 68 | 82 |
| Snow | – | 70 |
| Comfort | 65 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 74 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP
CrossClimate SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B CrossClimate SUV
Pros
- Exceptional all-weather traction, particularly in wet, cold, and light snow conditions.
- High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise for most users.
- Strong durability and longevity with minimal tread wear reported by many owners.
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise or 'growling' as the tire ages.
- Ride quality can feel overly firm or harsh on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Some users noted a decline in wet-weather performance as the tire reaches the end of its life.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Michelin CrossClimate SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 14 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP
Michelin CrossClimate SUV
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate SUV — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 82 vs 62 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 82 vs 68 on wet.
Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 71 vs 57 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or CrossClimate SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or CrossClimate SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate SUV, 82 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or CrossClimate SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate SUV, 82 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or CrossClimate SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate SUV, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or CrossClimate SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology