Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 910 + 80 owner reviews. How we score
AVID Ascend is ahead, 71–66
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 80 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 74 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
AVID Ascend: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 71
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 75 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
AVID Ascend: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 53 | 62 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60
AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 65
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 73 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
AVID Ascend: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 74 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70
AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 64 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 71 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64
AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 65 | 74 |
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 71 |
| Dry | 67 | 71 |
| Wet | 67 | 74 |
| Snow | 60 | 65 |
| Comfort | 67 | 71 |
| Noise | 70 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dynapro HT RH12
AVID Ascend
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.
“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Based on 8 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 54 psi | 51 psi |
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Yokohama AVID Ascend
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better handling, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 74 vs 65 on handling.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 74 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 65 vs 60 on snow.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 71 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology