Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 910 + 80 owner reviews. How we score

AVID Ascend is ahead, 71–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HT RH12

All-Season tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Yokohama AVID Ascend
Tire BYokohama

AVID Ascend

Premium Touring All Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 80 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    AVID Ascend +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12AVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6774

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    AVID Ascend +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12AVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6675

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    AVID Ascend +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12AVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5362

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    AVID Ascend +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12AVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6673

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12AVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7574

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    AVID Ascend +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12AVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests64≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6471

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    AVID Ascend +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HT RH12AVID Ascend
    Reviews found online6574
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 vs Yokohama AVID Ascend: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HT RH12Yokohama AVID Ascend
Relative Score 66 71
Dry 67 71
Wet 67 74
Snow 60 65
Comfort 67 71
Noise 70 70
Treadwear 64 69
Handling (owners) 65 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HT RH12

AVID Ascend

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HT RH12

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B AVID Ascend

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
  • High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
  • Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain

Cons

  • Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
  • Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
  • Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
All owner themes in the AVID Ascend review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Positive

Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”

r/denverlist ·2025-12-09

“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”

ridgelineownersclub.com ·2012-10-28

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability

Based on 8 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama AVID Ascend

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
CategoryAll-Season tirePremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available241
Rim diameters15″ – 22″17″
Tread depth14/32″12/32″
UTQG—740 A A
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi75,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure54 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Yokohama AVID Ascend

Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better handling, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 74 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 74 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 65 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 71 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HT RH12 or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology