Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 5 reviews
Hankook Dynapro H/T vs Kumho KL33 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 435 owner reviews. How we score
KL33 is ahead, 59–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
KL33 +760Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 45 55 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 53
KL33: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 60
No road tests of dry for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
53
Wet
KL33 +1063Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 47 60 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 53
KL33: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63
No road tests of wet for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 47 – Dynapro H/T: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56
No road tests of snow for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
KL33 +961Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 45 57 Dynapro H/T: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.5 = 52
KL33: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
53
Treadwear
Dynapro H/T +152Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 44 44 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
KL33: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 43.5 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
43
Handling (owners)
KL33 +1457Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T KL33 Reviews found online 43 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro H/T | Kumho KL33 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 59 |
| Dry | 53 | 60 |
| Wet | 53 | 63 |
| Snow | 56 | – |
| Comfort | 52 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro H/T
KL33
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Tire B KL33
Pros
- Good value for money with competitive pricing
- Strong initial dry and wet grip/traction
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Premature tread wear and short lifespan
- Serious structural concerns including tread chipping, chunking, and delamination
- Road noise increases significantly as the tire wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro H/T | B · Kumho KL33 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 5 | 18 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 500 - 700 A - B A - B | — |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro H/T
Kumho KL33
Winner: Kumho KL33 — better handling, wet and comfort. Where the Hankook Dynapro H/T is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Dynapro H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho KL33 scores 57 vs 43 on handling.
Kumho KL33 scores 63 vs 53 on wet.
Kumho KL33 scores 61 vs 52 on comfort.
Kumho KL33 scores 60 vs 53 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro H/T or KL33?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro H/T or KL33?
Kumho KL33, 63 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro H/T or KL33?
Kumho KL33, 60 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro H/T or KL33?
Kumho KL33, 61 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro H/T or KL33?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 52 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology