Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro H/T vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
G Fit 4S is ahead, 75–57
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
G Fit 4S +1168Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 60 Reviews found online 51 79 -
60
Wet
G Fit 4S +2383Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 83 Reviews found online 57 84 -
59
Snow
G Fit 4S +1574Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 52 79 -
63
Comfort
G Fit 4S +1174Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Reviews found online 56 78 -
–
Noise
No comparison49Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 38 -
58
Treadwear
G Fit 4S +1674Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 52 77 -
48
Handling
G Fit 4S +3078Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Reviews found online 48 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro H/T | Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 75 |
| Dry | 57 | 68 |
| Wet | 60 | 83 |
| Snow | 59 | 74 |
| Comfort | 63 | 74 |
| Noise | – | 49 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 74 |
| Handling | 48 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
57
/ 100
Dynapro H/T
75
/ 100
G Fit 4S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Tire B G Fit 4S
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
- High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
- Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro H/T | B · Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | 79 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 13″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
57
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro H/T
75
/ 100
Laufenn G Fit 4S
Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 78 vs 48 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 83 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 74 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 74 vs 59 on snow.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro H/T
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.