Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro H/T vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 5 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
G Fit 4S is ahead, 78–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
G Fit 4S +1972Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 45 81 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 53
G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 72
No road tests of dry for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
53
Wet
G Fit 4S +3285Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 47 85 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 53
G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85
No road tests of wet for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
G Fit 4S +2177Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 47 77 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56
G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 77 = 77
No road tests of snow for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
G Fit 4S +2375Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 45 78 Dynapro H/T: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.5 = 52
G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 78.1 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison38Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 18 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 38
No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
53
Treadwear
G Fit 4S +2275Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 44 79 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
43
Handling (owners)
G Fit 4S +3780Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Reviews found online 43 80 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison47Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro H/T | Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 78 |
| Dry | 53 | 72 |
| Wet | 53 | 85 |
| Snow | 56 | 77 |
| Comfort | 52 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 38 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 80 |
| Efficiency | – | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
Dynapro H/T
78
/ 100
G Fit 4S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Tire B G Fit 4S
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
- High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
- Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro H/T | B · Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | 79 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 13″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 500 - 700 A - B A - B | 640 B A |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro H/T
78
/ 100
Laufenn G Fit 4S
Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 80 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 85 vs 53 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 75 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 75 vs 53 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro H/T
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro H/T or G Fit 4S?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro H/T or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro H/T or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 72 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro H/T or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 77 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro H/T or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro H/T or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology